IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v15y2026i1p30-d1834589.html

Religion and Continuity for Children in Care—An Examination of Public Views in 40 Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Zacky Dhaffa Pratama

    (Centre for Research on Discretion and Paternalism, Department of Government, University of Bergen, Christies Gate 17, 5007 Bergen, Norway)

  • Marit Skivenes

    (Centre for Research on Discretion and Paternalism, Department of Government, University of Bergen, Christies Gate 17, 5007 Bergen, Norway)

Abstract

This comparative study, the first to date, examines how representative samples of citizens across 40 OECD countries (N = 41,232) balance religion and child welfare when deciding whether to move a five-year-old thriving in foster care to match parental religion. Using a vignette experiment and six hypotheses, the analysis links religiosity, perceived religious rights, authoritarian values, institutional context, and confidence in child protection to placement preferences. A large majority (88%) would not move the child, prioritising stability and well-being. The results show a trust “paradox” in which higher confidence in child protection correlates with support for moving the child. Justifications show broad appeal to the best interest principle across opposing choices. Deference to professional assessment varies markedly across countries, indicating divergent authority of social work expertise. Findings underscore the need to operationalise the best interests standard and to account for institutional context, while policymakers should recognise stable placements as the public default.

Suggested Citation

  • Zacky Dhaffa Pratama & Marit Skivenes, 2026. "Religion and Continuity for Children in Care—An Examination of Public Views in 40 Countries," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:15:y:2026:i:1:p:30-:d:1834589
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/15/1/30/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/15/1/30/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:15:y:2026:i:1:p:30-:d:1834589. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.