Author
Listed:
- Rosa Monteiro
(CES—Centre for Social Studies, FEUC—Faculty of Economics, University of Coimbra, 3004-512 Coimbra, Portugal)
- Lina Coelho
(CES—Centre for Social Studies, FEUC—Faculty of Economics, University of Coimbra, 3004-512 Coimbra, Portugal)
- Fernanda Daniel
(CIBB—Centre for Innovative Biomedicine and Biotechnology, ISMT—Miguel Torga Institute of Higher Education, 3000-132 Coimbra, Portugal)
- Inês Simões
(CES—Centre for Social Studies, FEUC—Faculty of Economics, University of Coimbra, 3004-512 Coimbra, Portugal)
- Alexandre Gomes da Silva
(ISCAC—Coimbra Business School, Polytechnic University of Coimbra, 3045-601 Coimbra, Portugal)
Abstract
This article explores how gender biases in STEM education persist despite formal commitments to equality. Based on data from the Erasmus+ project STEMGenderIN, we analyze responses from lower-secondary school teachers (ISCED 2; ages 11–15), of STEM subjects, in Portugal, Italy, Belgium, and Romania using the TPGESE scale, which assesses three dimensions: perceived gender equality in education (PGEE), the awareness of the effects of gender segregation (AEGSE), and the naturalization of gender stereotypes (GSNGI). Findings show a consistent gap between teachers declared support for gender equality and their limited awareness of structural and cultural barriers faced by girls in STEM. While most teachers affirm equality in principle, many attribute girls’ underrepresentation to personal choice or aptitude, overlooking the influence of stereotypes, social expectations, and systemic inequalities. The results point to a paradox: formal recognition of gender equality coexists with low engagement in reflexive practice or institutional change. Differences between countries suggest varying degrees of critical awareness, with some contexts showing greater openness to questioning dominant narratives. This study highlights the urgent need for teacher training that goes beyond rhetoric, promoting deep pedagogical transformation and equipping educators to create more inclusive STEM learning environments. We argue that addressing the perception–practice gap is essential to closing the gender gap in STEM. To situate these findings, we also note how national cultural–political debates—such as Portugal’s public controversy around so-called “gender ideology” in Citizenship and Development—may shape teachers’ perceptions and self-reports, reinforcing the need for context-aware training.
Suggested Citation
Rosa Monteiro & Lina Coelho & Fernanda Daniel & Inês Simões & Alexandre Gomes da Silva, 2025.
"If You Don’t See Inequality, You Cannot Teach Equality: What Is Missing in STEM Teachers’ Perceptions for an Equality Pedagogy in STEM Teaching?,"
Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-20, September.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:14:y:2025:i:9:p:563-:d:1753623
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:14:y:2025:i:9:p:563-:d:1753623. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.