Author
Listed:
- Yingying Zeng
(School of Social Work, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA)
- Jin Huang
(Brown School, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA)
- Michael Sherraden
(Brown School, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA)
Abstract
Theory and empirical examination have shown ways in which households’ asset building for children may affect child well-being, including behavioral and emotional health. Previous research found that Child Development Accounts (CDAs), a universal and lifelong asset-building policy designed to encourage society and families to accumulate assets for children, have positive effects on social-emotional development at around 4 years of age. Using data from a unique longitudinal experiment of the CDA policy in the United States, this study examined the impacts of CDAs on adolescent behavior problems. Adolescent behavior problems were indicated by eight items from a 28-item Behavior Problems Index, focusing on children’s anxiety and disobedience. In the pre-COVID sample ( n = 676), results from the regression analysis show that the sum score of child behavior problems is about 0.12 standard deviations higher than that of counterparts in the control group, indicating less frequent behavior problems among children in the treatment group. Regression analyses on two latent measures of anxiety and disobedience showed that CDAs primarily affected children’s anxiety. However, there were no statistically significant differences in the full sample ( N = 1712); this could be related to the data-collection disruptions caused by the COVID pandemic. This study provides the first longitudinal follow-up evidence on the effects of CDAs on adolescent behavior problems. The findings show that universal asset building for adolescents reduces behavior problems. Policy implications are discussed.
Suggested Citation
Yingying Zeng & Jin Huang & Michael Sherraden, 2025.
"Effects of Child Development Accounts on Adolescent Behavior Problems: Evidence from a Longitudinal, Randomized Policy Experiment,"
Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-12, August.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:14:y:2025:i:8:p:495-:d:1725139
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:14:y:2025:i:8:p:495-:d:1725139. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.