IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v14y2025i8p455-d1709292.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring and Navigating Power Dynamics: A Case Study of Systemic Barriers to Inclusion and Equity for Black Women in Social Work Education

Author

Listed:
  • Arlene P. Weekes

    (Effective Personal and Professional Judgement (EPPJ) Ltd., Phoenix Business Centre, Rosslyn Crescent, Harrow HA1 2SP, UK)

Abstract

This paper explores the complex power dynamics of UK social work higher education through an autoethnographic account of a Black woman course leader’s experiences over a period of two years, focusing on issues related to race, internalized oppression, and class. Drawing on Critical Race Theory (CRT), narrative analysis, and lived experience, it examines how systemic inequities manifest through three interlinked themes: (a) academic contrapower harassment (ACPH), (b) internalized oppression and toxic team dynamics, and (c) the interplay of harassment, institutional failure, managerial inaction, and the marginalization of social work as a discipline. This study illustrates how the intersectionality of multiple identities—namely, race, gender, and professional identity—impacts career progression, well-being, and institutional inclusion. This study examines the tensions between social work’s ethical foundations and performance-driven academic environments, advocating for systemic and policy interventions to stimulate institutional reform and cultivate a more equitable culture that enhances educational outcomes and, ultimately, improves social work practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Arlene P. Weekes, 2025. "Exploring and Navigating Power Dynamics: A Case Study of Systemic Barriers to Inclusion and Equity for Black Women in Social Work Education," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-14, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:14:y:2025:i:8:p:455-:d:1709292
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/14/8/455/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/14/8/455/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:14:y:2025:i:8:p:455-:d:1709292. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.