IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v14y2025i6p363-d1674764.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inequalities in Self-Assessments of Mental and Physical Wellbeing Among Workers in the Tech Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Cristen Dalessandro

    (O.C. Tanner Institute, 1930 S State St, Salt Lake City, UT 84115, USA)

  • Alexander Lovell

    (O.C. Tanner Institute, 1930 S State St, Salt Lake City, UT 84115, USA)

Abstract

Although the technology (tech) industry has historically had a reputation for being supportive when it comes to wellbeing initiatives, research has found persistent disparities among the tech industry workforce. Therefore, using an original survey of tech workers worldwide (n = 1207), this paper explores whether gender and identification with racial “minority” status have an impact on self-reported levels of mental and physical wellbeing measures. Controlling for additional demographic variables, our regression model found that workers identifying as racial minorities at work (OR: 2.49; 95%CI 1.80–3.43) were significantly more likely to report lower mental wellbeing scores. Additional analyses found that compared to men who did not identify as a racial minority, minority-identified women (OR: 3.48; 95%CI 2.10–5.76) and men (OR: 2.10; 95% CI 1.40–3.15) were significantly more likely to report worse mental wellbeing, and minority-identified men were significantly more likely to report that work had a negative impact on their physical health as well (OR: 1.78; 95%CI 1.18–2.68). Due to the international scope of our project, our research suggests that demographic disparities in physical and mental wellbeing among tech workers is an ongoing problem on a global scale.

Suggested Citation

  • Cristen Dalessandro & Alexander Lovell, 2025. "Inequalities in Self-Assessments of Mental and Physical Wellbeing Among Workers in the Tech Industry," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:14:y:2025:i:6:p:363-:d:1674764
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/14/6/363/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/14/6/363/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:14:y:2025:i:6:p:363-:d:1674764. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.