IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v14y2025i6p341-d1666314.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Migrant Perceptions of Criminal Justice Systems: A Comparative Study of U.S. and Home Country Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Fei Luo

    (Department of Social Sciences, Texas A&M International University, 5201 University Blvd., Laredo, TX 78041-1920, USA)

  • John C. Kilburn

    (Department of Social Sciences, Texas A&M International University, 5201 University Blvd., Laredo, TX 78041-1920, USA)

Abstract

Background: The United States has the highest number of immigrants in the world, with over 46 million foreign-born residents as of 2022. A growing number of migrants originate from Latin America, driven by factors such as economic instability, food insecurity, and crime. This study explores their experiences and perceptions regarding trust in the criminal justice system (CJS) in both their home countries and the United States. Methods: This study surveyed 500 migrants at a transitional institution in a U.S.–Mexico border city in the summer of 2023. The survey assessed confidence in law enforcement, immigration officers, courts, and government institutions using a 5-point Likert scale. Results: Migrants reported significantly higher confidence in the U.S. CJS compared to that of their home countries. Multivariate analysis revealed that satisfaction with border officials, documentation status, English proficiency, and health were positively associated with confidence in the U.S. CJS, while employment status, traveling with family, and fear of crime correlated with lower confidence. Conclusions: This study highlights the stark contrast in migrants’ confidence levels between their home countries and the U.S. criminal justice system. While migrants view the U.S. system as more legitimate, challenges such as fear of crime and legal uncertainties persist.

Suggested Citation

  • Fei Luo & John C. Kilburn, 2025. "Migrant Perceptions of Criminal Justice Systems: A Comparative Study of U.S. and Home Country Systems," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-15, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:14:y:2025:i:6:p:341-:d:1666314
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/14/6/341/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/14/6/341/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:14:y:2025:i:6:p:341-:d:1666314. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.