IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v14y2025i6p337-d1665710.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cultural Divergence in Emotion Regulation: U.S. and Korean Relationship Dynamics During Social Crises

Author

Listed:
  • Min Young Kim

    (Department of Psychology, Keimyung University, Daegu 42602, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

(1) Background: In times of social crisis, the way individuals manage their emotions undergoes substantial changes. As emotion regulation strategies also vary across cultures, how they impact relationship dynamics between U.S. and Korean populations may differ. This study explores these cultural differences, shedding light on the interplay between culture, emotion, and social dynamics. (2) Methods: Through analysis of 210 U.S. and 197 Korean participants, the research investigated three relationship categories: spousal/couple relationships, family relationships, and friendships during social crisis. (3) Results: Using moderated mediation analysis, results revealed distinct patterns in ER’s mediating effects across these relationship types, with notable cultural variations. In spousal relationships, ER partially mediated the NA-relationship quality association among American participants but showed no mediation effect among Korean participants. Family relationships demonstrated complete ER mediation across both cultural groups, while friendships showed partial mediation effects regardless of cultural background; (4) Conclusions: These findings highlight how relationship type and cultural context jointly shape the role of emotion regulation in relationship quality, advancing our understanding of emotional dynamics across different cultural and relational settings. The study provides implications for developing culturally sensitive approaches to relationship maintenance and intervention strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Min Young Kim, 2025. "Cultural Divergence in Emotion Regulation: U.S. and Korean Relationship Dynamics During Social Crises," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-12, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:14:y:2025:i:6:p:337-:d:1665710
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/14/6/337/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/14/6/337/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:14:y:2025:i:6:p:337-:d:1665710. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.