IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v14y2025i5p311-d1659234.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Who Really Leads? A Qualitative Exploration of Gender Equity in Leadership of Australian Newsrooms

Author

Listed:
  • Diana Bossio

    (School—Media & Communication, RMIT University, Melbourne 3001, Australia)

  • Andrea Carson

    (School of Humanities and Social Sciences, La Trobe University, Melbourne 3086, Australia)

Abstract

While recent research shows that women’s leadership in Australian newsrooms has grown, we have little understanding of how this change may have impacted career opportunities for women, or the newsroom more broadly. We draw from in-depth, semi-structured interviews with editorial leaders in newsrooms across Australia to understand how editorial leaders perceive the impact of women’s leadership on newsrooms. We find that Australian newsrooms have transformed in the last decade, with women dominating editorial leadership and staffing that is more reflective of gender equity. However, the interview data make clear that there are two exceptions—firstly, the executive C-suite of most mainstream news organisations is still dominated by men, and secondly, women’s leadership across reporting topics is still dominated by soft news. We, thus, provide evidence of just how much women’s editorial leadership roles appear to have resolved some of the gendered divisions in Australian newsrooms and the journalism they produce.

Suggested Citation

  • Diana Bossio & Andrea Carson, 2025. "Who Really Leads? A Qualitative Exploration of Gender Equity in Leadership of Australian Newsrooms," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-12, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:14:y:2025:i:5:p:311-:d:1659234
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/14/5/311/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/14/5/311/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:14:y:2025:i:5:p:311-:d:1659234. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.