IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v14y2025i5p265-d1642564.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Feasibility of Tiyanjane: A Family–School–Community Intervention Promoting Parental Involvement in the Education of Children with Disabilities in Malawi

Author

Listed:
  • David John Musendo

    (International Centre for Evidence in Disability, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK)

  • Sarah Polack

    (International Centre for Evidence in Disability, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK)

  • Blessings Chirwa

    (Department of Water and Sanitation, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Mzuzu University, Mzuzu P.O. Box 201, Malawi)

  • Ellen S. Nkambule

    (Department of Nursing and Midwifery, Mzuzu University, Mzuzu P.O. Box 201, Malawi)

  • Claire Mukakagame

    (Development Studies Department, Faculty of Social Sciences, Kigali Independent University, Kigali P.O. Box 2280, Rwanda)

  • Magnolia Chikanya

    (Department of Statistical Science, Faculty of Science, University of Capetown, Cape Town 7701, South Africa)

  • Thomas A. Nkhonjera

    (Department of Agricultural Sciences, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Mzuzu University, Mzuzu P.O. Box 201, Malawi)

  • Tracey Smythe

    (International Centre for Evidence in Disability, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK
    Centre for Evidence in Disability, Department of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town 7602, South Africa)

Abstract

Evidence-based and theory-informed interventions focusing on parents of children with disabilities in low-income countries are scarce. This study examined the feasibility of Tiyanjane, a 12-week pilot intervention developed to promote parental involvement in the education of children with disabilities in Malawi. A mixed-method approach was employed based on five aspects of Bowen’s feasibility framework: acceptability, demand, implementation, practicality, and limited efficacy. Twenty-one participants (13 caregivers, four teachers, and four local leaders) participated in the study. Standardised measures, namely the Parent and Family Adjustment Scale (PAFAS) and the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS), were employed to evaluate changes in parental practices, adjustments, and perceived social support. Qualitative data were collected using focus groups and in-depth interviews to assess the feasibility of the intervention. Tiyanjane showed promise in promoting parental involvement in the education of children with disabilities. The intervention demonstrated high fidelity, achieving 100% retention and 95% attendance. Local resources, commitment from participants and facilitators, and strong family school–community ties enabled the practicality and execution of the intervention. Significant improvements were observed in the PAFAS and MSPSS scores across the assessed post-intervention outcomes. Minor logistical issues including resource and implementation challenges were reported. Tiyanjane was feasible for the facilitators and participants in the Malawian context. Further studies are needed to assess the programme’s adaptation, integration, and expansion in other contexts before scaling up.

Suggested Citation

  • David John Musendo & Sarah Polack & Blessings Chirwa & Ellen S. Nkambule & Claire Mukakagame & Magnolia Chikanya & Thomas A. Nkhonjera & Tracey Smythe, 2025. "Feasibility of Tiyanjane: A Family–School–Community Intervention Promoting Parental Involvement in the Education of Children with Disabilities in Malawi," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-22, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:14:y:2025:i:5:p:265-:d:1642564
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/14/5/265/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/14/5/265/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:14:y:2025:i:5:p:265-:d:1642564. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.