IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v14y2025i4p241-d1635366.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Support and Autonomy: Social Workers’ Approaches in Dutch Shelters for Female Survivors of Domestic Violence

Author

Listed:
  • Chloé Roegiers Mayeux

    (Chair Group of Citizenship and Humanisation of the Public Sector, University of Humanistic Studies, 3512 HD Utrecht, The Netherlands)

  • Sawitri Saharso

    (Department of Sociology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

  • Evelien Tonkens

    (Chair Group of Citizenship and Humanisation of the Public Sector, University of Humanistic Studies, 3512 HD Utrecht, The Netherlands)

  • Jonathan Darling

    (Department of Geography, Durham University, Durham DH1 3LE, UK)

Abstract

It is not uncommon that women residing in Dutch shelters following domestic violence consider returning to their partners during the course of their stay. Social workers cannot prohibit return due to the importance of the client’s autonomy, as stated in the Code of Ethics. Simultaneously, social workers aim to ensure women’s safety and encourage a positive future, which can lead to tensions in their way of support-giving. Based on thirty-five interviews with social workers, this study explores how they navigate these tensions and the support they give in such cases. Building on Martha Nussbaum’s capabilities approach, we distinguish a hands-off and an interventionist approach to autonomy. While the hands-off approach leads to non-intervention and respecting the woman’s decision, the interventionist approach focuses on providing tools and encouraging safer alternatives. The findings show that the hands-off approach is the common type of support, leading to feelings of powerlessness for social workers and often prompting endeavors to intervene more actively. Simultaneously, we argue that, whilst the Code of Ethics demonstrates an ambivalence towards these different forms of autonomy, it is often interpreted by social workers as promoting only a hands-off approach. Consequently, we argue that social workers would benefit from a greater recognition of an interventionist approach to autonomy and more liberty in support-giving.

Suggested Citation

  • Chloé Roegiers Mayeux & Sawitri Saharso & Evelien Tonkens & Jonathan Darling, 2025. "Support and Autonomy: Social Workers’ Approaches in Dutch Shelters for Female Survivors of Domestic Violence," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-20, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:241-:d:1635366
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/14/4/241/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/14/4/241/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:241-:d:1635366. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.