IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v14y2025i4p233-d1632187.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Beyond Equality—Non-Monogamy and the Necropolitics of Marriage

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Cardoso

    (Department of Communication Sciences, Lusófona University, Lisbon, 1749-024 Lisbon, Portugal
    Department of Communication Sciences, NOVA University of Lisbon, Lisbon, 1069-061 Lisbon, Portugal
    CICANT—Centre for Research in Applied Communication and New Technologies, Lusófona University, https://doi.org/10.54499/UIDB/05260/2020 .)

  • Christian Klesse

    (Department of Sociology, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester M15 6BX, UK)

Abstract

‘Marriage equality’ has been a widely used slogan and mobilizing concept for LGBTQ+ rights’ movements across the globe striving for formal recognition for ‘same-sex’ or ‘same-gender’ marriages. In this article, we critically interrogate the terminology and political rationality that have given shape to ‘marriage equality’ campaigns. We demonstrate the structural erasure of non-monogamous relations and populations from the changes hoped for and envisioned in these mobilizations. The lack of any genuine and substantial concern with consensual non-monogamies (CNMs) from most of the literature in the field highlights the close entanglement of marriage with monogamy. As a result, ideas are scarce about how meaningful and adequate legal recognition and social policy provisions for a wide range of intimate, sexual, familial, and/or caring bonds or constellations on the CNM continuum could look like. We argue that the critique of the mononormativity inherent to marriage is fundamental to understanding the role of this in the 21st century. We identify the roots of the mononormativity of marriage in its governmental role as a necropolitical and biopolitical technology, evidenced by its ‘civilizing’ function in white settler colonial projects. Because of this, an expansion of the call for equality to include non-monogamous populations does not resolve but rather aggravates the problem. We conclude that any truly queer politics of CNM consequently needs to be anti-marriage.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Cardoso & Christian Klesse, 2025. "Beyond Equality—Non-Monogamy and the Necropolitics of Marriage," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-28, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:233-:d:1632187
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/14/4/233/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/14/4/233/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:233-:d:1632187. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.