IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v14y2025i4p229-d1629586.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Revaluing Indigenous Models in Suicidology: A Brief Narrative Synthesis

Author

Listed:
  • Joanna Brooke

    (Big Anxiety Research Centre, The University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia
    School of Social Sciences, The University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia)

  • Caroline Lenette

    (Big Anxiety Research Centre, The University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia
    School of Social Sciences, The University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia)

  • Marianne Wobcke

    (Big Anxiety Research Centre, The University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia
    School of Social Sciences, The University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia)

  • Marly Wells

    (Independent Researcher, Melbourne 3000, Australia)

Abstract

This review uses an anti-colonial approach to explore the characteristics of Indigenous interventions and best practice relating to suicidality. Well-established interventions led by Indigenous communities exist globally, yet their prevalence in academic discussions of suicide is comparatively limited. This represents a missed opportunity for the field of suicidology to learn from Indigenous community-driven models, which have the potential to be translated across contexts. The challenges of sharing best practice Indigenous interventions in academic literature can be situated within a pervasive colonial discourse, which categorises suicide as an ‘Indigenous problem’ and creates ill-fitted evaluation and intervention methodologies. Here, we provide a brief narrative synthesis of contemporary research on Indigenous suicide intervention models in Australia, Aotearoa New Zealand, the United States and Canada, focusing on key characteristics of interventions and a selection of Indigenous community-driven projects. These characteristics are: cultural and collective approaches as protective factors; recognising social determinants of health and the impact of colonisation; community control and governance; evaluation and available research; and relationships and connection. We discuss issues of sustainability, funding, decontextualised research, and publishing and put forward recommendations for future research. Rebalancing academic discussions to centre Indigenous leadership and culturally grounded research and practice is not without its challenges and complexity but can crucially enrich the field of suicidology.

Suggested Citation

  • Joanna Brooke & Caroline Lenette & Marianne Wobcke & Marly Wells, 2025. "Revaluing Indigenous Models in Suicidology: A Brief Narrative Synthesis," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-23, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:229-:d:1629586
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/14/4/229/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/14/4/229/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:229-:d:1629586. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.