IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v14y2025i3p134-d1598518.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Resilience in STEM: The Role of Well-Being Against Media’s Unrealistic Body Ideals

Author

Listed:
  • Iulia Gonta

    (Teacher Training and Social Sciences Department, National University of Science and Technology POLITEHNICA, 060042 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Cristina Tripon

    (Teacher Training and Social Sciences Department, National University of Science and Technology POLITEHNICA, 060042 Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

Despite the growing influence of social media on both professional and personal lives, there is a noticeable lack of research on media literacy related to the perception of body image. This study aims to fill that gap by exploring well-being and the factors that support it. The sample included 520 students from both STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) and non-STEM fields. We utilized adapted psychometric scales to measure attitudes towards physical appearance (SATAQ), body shape dissatisfaction (BSQ), and psychological well-being (PWB). The procedure involved assessing well-being and media exposure, and completing questionnaires designed to measure the impact of media exposure. The findings revealed that both STEM and non-STEM students with higher well-being reported significantly lower negative effects from exposure to idealized body images compared to those with lower well-being. Additionally, greater self-acceptance, a stronger sense of purpose in life, and better environmental mastery were associated with a lower negative impact on body image. Comparing the groups, STEM students exhibited higher resilience to the negative effects of idealized body images. These insights highlight key protective factors critical for developing interventions and strategies for student resilience.

Suggested Citation

  • Iulia Gonta & Cristina Tripon, 2025. "Resilience in STEM: The Role of Well-Being Against Media’s Unrealistic Body Ideals," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-15, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:14:y:2025:i:3:p:134-:d:1598518
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/14/3/134/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/14/3/134/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:14:y:2025:i:3:p:134-:d:1598518. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.