IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v14y2025i11p646-d1787374.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Breaking Silos in Caregiving Research: Toward Unified Measures Across the Lifespan

Author

Listed:
  • Kate Perepezko

    (Scripps Gerontology Center, Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056, USA)

  • Anna Avery

    (Independent Researcher, Madison, WI 53706, USA)

  • Lauren M. Little

    (Occupational Therapy, College of Health Sciences, Rush University, Chicago, IL 60612, USA)

  • Timothy Dionne

    (Health Sciences, The University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA)

  • Beth Fields

    (Kinesiology, Univeristy of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA)

Abstract

The number of caregivers is increasing globally making it imperative that we better understand the impact of caregiving and identify methods to address caregiver needs and health. These goals are best achieved with unified research approaches and measures that facilitate comparison across studies. Despite the need and policy support for unified research on caregiving, research often happens in silos that are diagnostic or age specific. To address this need we interviewed 33 researchers who (1) identified process, and outcome measures they commonly used in their research and (2) explained their selection. We found that researchers across the lifespan are using similar measures in their studies and are consistent in what they look for in a measure. Researchers also described barriers they face when selecting measures, including: inadequacy of current measures, familiarity, need for rigor, and measurement characteristics. These findings highlight the need for the creation and dissemination of a prioritized list of process and outcome measures being used by caregiving researchers.

Suggested Citation

  • Kate Perepezko & Anna Avery & Lauren M. Little & Timothy Dionne & Beth Fields, 2025. "Breaking Silos in Caregiving Research: Toward Unified Measures Across the Lifespan," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-20, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:14:y:2025:i:11:p:646-:d:1787374
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/14/11/646/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/14/11/646/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:14:y:2025:i:11:p:646-:d:1787374. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.