IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v14y2025i11p641-d1784671.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Workplace Bullying in High-Risk Sectors: A Mixed-Methods Study on Prevalence and Impact Among Construction and Manufacturing Employees

Author

Listed:
  • Abdul Kadir

    (Occupational Health and Safety Department, Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Indonesia, Depok 16424, Indonesia)

  • Surindar K. Dhesi

    (Environmental Health and Risk Management, University of Birmingham, Brimingham B15 2TT, UK)

  • Bangga Agung Satrya

    (Medical Record and Health Information Management Program, Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Esa Unggul, Jakarta 11510, Indonesia)

  • Poppy Yuniar

    (Department of Biostatistics and Population Study, Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Indonesia, Depok 16424, Indonesia)

  • Hardy Atmajaya

    (Occupational Health and Safety Department, Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Indonesia, Depok 16424, Indonesia)

  • Farhan Fitriadi

    (Faculty of Administrative Sciences, Universitas Indonesia, Depok 16424, Indonesia)

  • Syafiq Fawwaz

    (Occupational Health and Safety Department, Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Indonesia, Depok 16424, Indonesia)

  • Sherin Salsabila Ramadhanty

    (Occupational Health and Safety Department, Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Indonesia, Depok 16424, Indonesia)

Abstract

Workplace bullying is a critical concern in high-risk sectors such as construction and manufacturing, where high-pressure environments, strict deadlines, and hierarchical structures may intensify the problem. Despite its serious impact on workers’ well-being and productivity, research in these sectors, particularly in Indonesia, is limited. This study examined the prevalence of workplace bullying, contributing factors, and its effects on mental health among construction and manufacturing workers. It also explored barriers to prevention and potential strategies for mitigation. A mixed-methods design was applied, involving 1029 workers (620 manufacturing, 409 construction). Quantitative data were collected using the Negative Acts Questionnaire—Revised (NAQ-R), while qualitative insights were obtained through Focus Group Discussions (FGDs). Analyses included chi-square tests, logistic regression, and thematic analysis. Bullying was more prevalent in construction, especially among younger and less experienced workers. Risk factors included work-related stress, role ambiguity, and gender dynamics. FGDs revealed underreporting due to absent policies, weak leadership, and workplace cultures that normalized aggression. Workplace bullying remains a significant issue in both sectors in Indonesia. Strong anti-bullying policies, effective leadership, and comprehensive training are essential. Transforming organizational culture toward inclusivity and support is critical to addressing this challenge.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdul Kadir & Surindar K. Dhesi & Bangga Agung Satrya & Poppy Yuniar & Hardy Atmajaya & Farhan Fitriadi & Syafiq Fawwaz & Sherin Salsabila Ramadhanty, 2025. "Workplace Bullying in High-Risk Sectors: A Mixed-Methods Study on Prevalence and Impact Among Construction and Manufacturing Employees," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-20, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:14:y:2025:i:11:p:641-:d:1784671
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/14/11/641/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/14/11/641/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:14:y:2025:i:11:p:641-:d:1784671. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.