Author
Listed:
- Williams Gilberto Jiménez García
(Social Sciences Faculty, Universidad de Los Andes, Bogotá 11001, Colombia)
- Daniel Sansó-Rubert
(Political Sciences and Sociology Faculty, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED), 28040 Madrid, Spain)
Abstract
Drug markets display varying levels of violence across urban contexts, and understanding the drivers behind these differences is essential for designing effective interventions. (1) Background: This study investigates why some cocaine markets are more violent than others, focusing on four cities: Ciudad Juárez, Pereira, Frankfurt, and Madrid. (2) Methods: Using fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA), we examined complex configurations of institutional, social, and market-related factors. Data were collected through 56 semi-structured interviews and secondary sources from 2015 to 2020. (3) Results: The findings reveal that violence arises from specific combinations of factors rather than isolated variables. In Latin American cities, violence is associated with weak institutional control, dense criminal networks, high social vulnerability, and fragmented market structures. In contrast, European cities show lower levels of violence due to stronger institutions, effective law enforcement, and well-regulated markets. (4) Conclusions: Addressing violence in cocaine markets requires context-specific strategies that take into account institutional capacity, market dynamics, and broader social conditions. These findings challenge simplistic views of drug market violence and emphasize the need for tailored interventions to mitigate violence effectively.
Suggested Citation
Williams Gilberto Jiménez García & Daniel Sansó-Rubert, 2025.
"Why Are Some Drug Markets More Violent than Others? An Analysis of Violence Using Fuzzy Logic,"
Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-23, October.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:14:y:2025:i:11:p:640-:d:1784563
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:14:y:2025:i:11:p:640-:d:1784563. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.