Author
Listed:
- Rahaf Koja
(Health and Social Care, Elizabith School of London, Leicester LE1 7JA, UK)
- David Oliver
(Tizard Centre, Kent University, Canterbury CT2 7NX, UK)
- Rachel Forrester-Jones
(School of Health Studies, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Western Ontario, London, ON N6A 2K5, Canada)
Abstract
The UNHCR reported that over 123.2 million people were forcibly displaced worldwide by the end of 2024, with the mental health of refugees emerging as a critical issue. In the UK, asylum seekers and refugees make up around 13% of immigrants and the number is increasing year on year. The Immigration and Asylum Act 1999 aimed to ensure that most cases of asylum seekers would be decided fairly, and within six months. However, it has been argued that long wait times and systemic inequalities and inequities within the asylum system have contributed to heightened mental health problems among refugees even once they gain refugee status. The present study aimed to examine the factors that refugees perceive as limiting their ability and willingness to access mental health services in the UK. A systematic review of 15 relevant articles followed the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. Results highlight intersecting perceived limitations to accessing mental health services, such as language difficulties, cultural disconnection regarding mental health including stigma and prejudice, mistrust of services as well as structural barriers including general service limitations and the involuntary transient nature of many refugees’ lives. Policy recommendations emphasize integrating ethnic minority organizations into services, developing culturally adapted services that take into consideration the views of refugees, and ensuring holistic approaches to address socio-economic determinants.
Suggested Citation
Rahaf Koja & David Oliver & Rachel Forrester-Jones, 2025.
"Factors That Affect Refugees’ Perceptions of Mental Health Services in the UK: A Systematic Review,"
Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-26, October.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:14:y:2025:i:11:p:635-:d:1782900
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:14:y:2025:i:11:p:635-:d:1782900. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.