Author
Listed:
- Ana Isabel Sánchez
(Mind, Brain and Behavior Research Center (CIMCYC), University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain
Faculty of Psychology, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain)
- Aida Fernández
(Faculty of Psychology, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain)
- Almudena Lorite
(Faculty of Psychology, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain)
- Clotilde Berzosa Sáez
(Faculty of Psychology, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain
Social Insertion Centre Matilde Cantos Fernández, General Secretary of Penitentiary Institutions, 18013 Granada, Spain)
- Elena Miró
(Mind, Brain and Behavior Research Center (CIMCYC), University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain
Faculty of Psychology, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain)
- María Pilar Martínez
(Mind, Brain and Behavior Research Center (CIMCYC), University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain
Faculty of Psychology, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain)
- Raúl Quevedo-Blasco
(Mind, Brain and Behavior Research Center (CIMCYC), University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain
Faculty of Psychology, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain)
Abstract
Gender-based violence (GBV) and traffic offenses pose significant public health challenges and contribute to widespread social issues globally. This study examines the sociodemographic and psychological profiles of individuals who commit traffic offenses and GBV, focusing on three alternative penal programs: TASEVAL (for traffic offenses), PRIA-MA, and reGENER@r (both for GBV). The study involved 54 participants distributed across these programs, using various psychometric tests to assess their profiles. Participants across the three programs (TASEVAL, PRIA-MA, and reGENER@R) were comparable in age (mean range 39.13–40.69 years) and nationality, with roughly half having prior contact with the justice system. Educational levels varied, with TASEVAL participants mainly completing secondary education (43.8%), PRIA-MA participants primary education (43.8%), and reGENER@R participants post-secondary education (59.1%). Employment status differed slightly, with TASEVAL and reGENER@R participants mainly employed (62.5% and 63.6%, respectively), while most PRIA-MA participants were unemployed (56.3%). Family characteristics varied across groups. In TASEVAL, having a partner and no children predominated (62.5% and 31.3%); in PRIA-MA, not having a partner and having two children predominated (62.5% and 37.5%); and, in reGENER@R, not having a partner and having one child predominated (59.1% and 31.8%). No significant differences were observed in sociodemographic variables. Regarding psychological characteristics, results across all groups indicate a marked presence of psychopathological symptoms and difficulties in emotional intelligence domains, with a significant correlation between psychological traits and coping strategies. These findings highlight the importance of tailoring alternative penal measures to the specific characteristics of each group to enhance effectiveness and reduce recidivism.
Suggested Citation
Ana Isabel Sánchez & Aida Fernández & Almudena Lorite & Clotilde Berzosa Sáez & Elena Miró & María Pilar Martínez & Raúl Quevedo-Blasco, 2025.
"Sociodemographic and Psychological Profile of Offenders in Alternative Penal Measures: A Comparative Study of the TASEVAL, PRIA-MA, and reGENER@r Programs,"
Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-18, October.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:14:y:2025:i:10:p:589-:d:1764607
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:14:y:2025:i:10:p:589-:d:1764607. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.