IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v13y2024i3p170-d1358794.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using Inclusive Research Methods and the Housing Pathways Framework in Future Planning and Housing Research: A Pilot Study

Author

Listed:
  • Irene Belperio

    (Disability and Community Inclusion, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park SA 5042, Australia)

  • Fiona Rillotta

    (Disability and Community Inclusion, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park SA 5042, Australia)

  • Tim Adam

    (Disability and Community Inclusion, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park SA 5042, Australia)

  • Ruth Walker

    (Disability and Community Inclusion, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park SA 5042, Australia)

  • Claire Hutchinson

    (Disability and Community Inclusion, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park SA 5042, Australia)

Abstract

Housing and future planning have been key areas of interest in intellectual and development disabilities research for a number of decades. However, the voices of adults with intellectual disabilities are underrepresented in this area of research. Furthermore, the use of inclusive research methods remains limited in the literature. This study sought to pilot the use of inclusive research approaches to investigate the viability of these methods and to begin to build an evidence base of inclusive research in this area of work. Inclusive data analysis and co-authorship approaches were used on a small qualitative dataset from a larger study investigating future planning and transitions out of the family home by adults with intellectual disabilities and their families in Australia. Three semi-structured interviews with adults with intellectual disabilities and family members regarding their housing preferences and planning were analysed using an inclusive data analysis approach following the principles of Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. These were then further analysed using a plain language version of the housing pathways framework. The results of the pilot study will be used to inform the inclusive research methods used for the remainder of the project dataset. Overall, the use of inclusive methods to pilot a conceptual model to better understand qualitative data was found to be feasible. Small adjustments to the process and accessibility to better support engagement with the research process are recommended. Lastly, greater investigation into co-authorship approaches and options is suggested as a fruitful avenue of inquiry for future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Irene Belperio & Fiona Rillotta & Tim Adam & Ruth Walker & Claire Hutchinson, 2024. "Using Inclusive Research Methods and the Housing Pathways Framework in Future Planning and Housing Research: A Pilot Study," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-15, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:13:y:2024:i:3:p:170-:d:1358794
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/13/3/170/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/13/3/170/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Mackie, 2012. "Housing Pathways of Disabled Young People: Evidence for Policy and Practice," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(6), pages 805-821.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anna Clarke, 2016. "The Prevalence of Rough Sleeping and Sofa Surfing Amongst Young People in the UK," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(4), pages 60-72.
    2. Isobel Anderson & Dianne-Dominique Theakstone & Julia Lawrence, 2020. "Inclusive Social Lettings Practice: Opportunities to Enhance Independent Living for Disabled People," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(3), pages 54-65.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:13:y:2024:i:3:p:170-:d:1358794. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.