IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v13y2024i3p130-d1347045.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring How the Dark Triad and Curiosity Shape the Trajectory of Affective Events in Response to COVID-19 Stress and Psychological Well-Being: A Three-Way Interaction Model

Author

Listed:
  • Ana Junça-Silva

    (Business ISCTE—Instituto Universitário de Lisboa, 1649-026 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Rita Rueff-Lopes

    (Esade Business School, Ramon Llull University, 08034 Barcelona, Spain)

Abstract

Background: The present research relied on the affective events theory to develop a framework explaining how daily micro-events trigger affective reactions that, in turn, influence quality-of-life indicators (i.e., psychological well-being and COVID-19 stress). We further delineated theoretical arguments for curiosity as a boundary condition that moderated this relation and proposed the dark triad (Machiavellianism, narcissism, and psychopathy) as a threatening factor. Methods: We conducted two studies to test the model. Study one analyzed the moderated mediation model regarding COVID-19 stress (n = 241), and study two (n = 653) analyzed the model regarding psychological well-being as the outcome. Results: Study one demonstrated that daily hassles increased COVID-19 stress via a negative effect, but this was not contingent on the levels of curiosity and the dark triad traits. However, the mediating path of positive affect between daily uplifts and COVID-19 stress was conditional upon the levels of curiosity and the dark triad traits (Machiavellianism and psychopathy), such that when individuals scored high on curiosity and dark traits, the indirect effect became stronger. The results showed that narcissism did not moderate the moderated mediation relationship. Study two showed that daily uplifts boosted psychological well-being through positive affect, and this relation was dependent on curiosity and on the three dark traits, such that it became weaker as curiosity decreased and the dark triad traits increased. We also found that daily hassles, by triggering negative affect, decreased psychological well-being, in particular for those who scored lower on curiosity and higher on psychopathy and narcissism (but not for Machiavellianism). Conclusions: Overall, COVID-19 stress seems to be more responsive to daily hassles than to daily uplifts. Nevertheless, when daily uplifts are factored in, they foster a sense of well-being that helps reduce COVID-19-related stress, especially in individuals who are naturally curious and exhibit high levels of Machiavellian and psychopathic traits. Conversely, psychological well-being appears to be more influenced by situational factors, as it is affected by both types of daily micro-events. We discuss the implications of both studies in light of the affective events theory.

Suggested Citation

  • Ana Junça-Silva & Rita Rueff-Lopes, 2024. "Exploring How the Dark Triad and Curiosity Shape the Trajectory of Affective Events in Response to COVID-19 Stress and Psychological Well-Being: A Three-Way Interaction Model," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-25, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:13:y:2024:i:3:p:130-:d:1347045
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/13/3/130/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/13/3/130/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Neubert, Jonas C. & Mainert, Jakob & Kretzschmar, André & Greiff, Samuel, 2015. "The Assessment of 21st Century Skills in Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Complex and Collaborative Problem Solving," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(2), pages 238-268, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Campbell, Throy Alexander, 2018. "A phenomenological study of business graduates' employment experiences in the changing economy," Journal for Labour Market Research, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany], vol. 52(1), pages 1-4.
    2. Throy Alexander Campbell, 2018. "A phenomenological study of business graduates’ employment experiences in the changing economy," Journal for Labour Market Research, Springer;Institute for Employment Research/ Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), vol. 52(1), pages 1-10, December.
    3. repec:iab:iabjlr:v:52:i:1:p:art.4 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Omar Habets & Jol Stoffers & Beatrice Van der Heijden & Pascale Peters, 2020. "Am I Fit for Tomorrow’s Labor Market? The Effect of Graduates’ Skills Development during Higher Education for the 21st Century’s Labor Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-13, September.
    5. Campbell, Throy Alexander, 2018. "A phenomenological study of business graduates' employment experiences in the changing economy," Journal for Labour Market Research, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany], vol. 52(1), pages .4(1-10).
    6. Yafeng Zheng & Haogang Bao & Jun Shen & Xuesong Zhai, 2020. "Investigating Sequence Patterns of Collaborative Problem-Solving Behavior in Online Collaborative Discussion Activity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-17, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:13:y:2024:i:3:p:130-:d:1347045. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.