IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v13y2024i3p129-d1344682.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

University Students’ Conceptualisation of AI Literacy: Theory and Empirical Evidence

Author

Listed:
  • Michal Černý

    (Department of Information Science and Librarianship, Faculty of Arts, Masaryk University in Brno, 602 00 Brno, Czech Republic)

Abstract

This research endeavours to systematically investigate the multifaceted domain of AI literacy, given the pervasive impact of artificial intelligence on diverse facets of contemporary human existence. The inquiry is motivated by a fundamental question posed to educators: how best to cultivate AI literacies and competencies and how these proficiencies are structured and influenced. Employing a rigorous two-part methodology, the initial phase scrutinises 28 studies from the SCOPUS database, unveiling five distinct discourses germane to AI literacy. Subsequently, the second phase involves the administration of questionnaires to 73 students, whose responses undergo thematic analysis to discern patterns within the four domains delineated by Ng et al. The ensuing discourse underscores a pivotal revelation: despite formal adherence to established discourses, the conceptualisation of AI literacy necessitates a departure from conventional perspectives. Ethical principles, elucidated by students, emerge not merely as individual components but as integral facets of a broader societal literacy profile, thereby advocating a paradigm shift towards social reflection. This novel insight prompts a critical re-evaluation of AI literacy’s prevailing assumptions and conceptual frameworks, urging a transition towards models grounded in ecological or network dynamic interactionist principles.

Suggested Citation

  • Michal Černý, 2024. "University Students’ Conceptualisation of AI Literacy: Theory and Empirical Evidence," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-26, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:13:y:2024:i:3:p:129-:d:1344682
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/13/3/129/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/13/3/129/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:13:y:2024:i:3:p:129-:d:1344682. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.