Author
Listed:
- Marg Rogers
(School of Education, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia
Manna Institute, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia)
- Fabio Dovigo
(Department of Human Sciences, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy)
- Astrid Mus Rasmussen
(Department of German and Romance Languages, School of Communication and Culture, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark)
- Khatuna Dolidze
(School of Business, Technology and Education, Ilia State University, Tbilisi 0162, Georgia)
- Laura Doan
(School of Education, Thompson Rivers University, Kamloops, BC V2C 0C8, Canada)
Abstract
Partnerships with parents in early childhood education and care services are a hallmark of quality education. Educators in Western countries work within a highly regulated environment, where government documents, such as frameworks, standards, and curricula, direct most of their work, time, and energy. Despite this, data from our mixed methods online survey from Australia, Canada, Denmark, Georgia, and Italy revealed a strong resistance to the homogeneity these documents prescribe. For the quantitative data, we used cross-tabulation and descriptive statistics. For the qualitative data, we used deductive thematic analysis using a parent–educator partnership framework. Educators described parents in their service as partners in their child’s education. This included efforts to share information, consult, negotiate, and build partnerships; problem solve; and monitor, report and manage the partnership. The educators talked about the uniqueness of their approaches to parents and families within their contextualised services. They then revealed how these unique features impacted their notions of quality and practice in these services. This will be of interest to policymakers, educators, and teacher educators.
Suggested Citation
Marg Rogers & Fabio Dovigo & Astrid Mus Rasmussen & Khatuna Dolidze & Laura Doan, 2024.
"Contextualised, Not Neoliberalised, Approaches to Families in Five Countries: Quality and Practice,"
Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-20, December.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:13:y:2024:i:12:p:695-:d:1548652
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:13:y:2024:i:12:p:695-:d:1548652. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.