IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v12y2023i9p528-d1245060.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gendered Perspectives on Intimate Partner Violence: A Comparative Study of General Population, Students and Professionals’ Beliefs

Author

Listed:
  • Iris Almeida

    (Egas Moniz Center for Interdisciplinary Research (CiiEM), Egas Moniz School of Health & Science, 2829-511 Caparica, Almada, Portugal
    Egas Moniz Forensic and Psychological Sciences Laboratory (LCFPEM), 2829-511 Caparica, Almada, Portugal)

  • Ana Ramalho

    (Egas Moniz Forensic and Psychological Sciences Laboratory (LCFPEM), 2829-511 Caparica, Almada, Portugal)

  • Rafaela Morgado

    (Egas Moniz Forensic and Psychological Sciences Laboratory (LCFPEM), 2829-511 Caparica, Almada, Portugal)

  • Ricardo Ventura Baúto

    (Egas Moniz Center for Interdisciplinary Research (CiiEM), Egas Moniz School of Health & Science, 2829-511 Caparica, Almada, Portugal
    Egas Moniz Forensic and Psychological Sciences Laboratory (LCFPEM), 2829-511 Caparica, Almada, Portugal)

Abstract

Domestic violence is a worldwide crime recognized as a severe violation of Human Rights, which includes Intimate Partner Violence (IPV). The studies remark that the asymmetries in the social relations between men and women result in domination dynamics. Thus, this study analyzed the relationship between gender and IPV beliefs in the general population, university students, and healthcare/safety/justice professionals by comparing IPV legitimization between men and women and with age. The sample was composed by 3413 Portuguese participants, 1551 men (45.4%) and 1826 women (54.6%), aged 18 to 100 ( M = 37.97; SD = 18.09), 1936 participants from the general population (56.7%), 866 university students [e.g., healthcare students] (25.4%) and 611 healthcare/safety/justice professionals [e.g., doctors, psychologists, police officers, lawyers] (17.9%). The sample filled out the Scale of Beliefs about Marital Violence (ECVC), a self-report scale on beliefs about IPV. Results confirmed our hypothesis that men have significantly higher levels of IPV legitimization than women. In accordance with our second hypothesis, significant positive correlations were found between age and IPV beliefs. As age increases, older people tend to be more tolerant of IPV, and young people tend to be less endorsing such IPV beliefs. Finally, we found the hypothesis that university students and healthcare/safety/justice professionals have lower levels of beliefs compared with other participants in the general population. Findings show that we need to work hard with the social evolution in men’s and women’s beliefs on IPV, reinforcing the importance of targeting IPV prevention by gender and age in the general population but also in students and professionals.

Suggested Citation

  • Iris Almeida & Ana Ramalho & Rafaela Morgado & Ricardo Ventura Baúto, 2023. "Gendered Perspectives on Intimate Partner Violence: A Comparative Study of General Population, Students and Professionals’ Beliefs," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-15, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:12:y:2023:i:9:p:528-:d:1245060
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/12/9/528/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/12/9/528/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:12:y:2023:i:9:p:528-:d:1245060. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.