IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v12y2023i7p392-d1186901.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Medicines and Medication Literacy: Social Practices and Use of Information

Author

Listed:
  • Noémia Lopes

    (CiiEM—Egas Moniz Interdisciplinary Research Center, Egas Moniz School of Health and Science, Quinta da Granja, Monte de Caparica, 2829-511 Caparica, Portugal
    Iscte—Instituto Universitário de Lisboa, CIES-Iscte, 1649-026 Lisbon, Portugal)

  • Elsa Pegado

    (Iscte—Instituto Universitário de Lisboa, CIES-Iscte, 1649-026 Lisbon, Portugal)

  • Catarina Egreja

    (CiiEM—Egas Moniz Interdisciplinary Research Center, Egas Moniz School of Health and Science, Quinta da Granja, Monte de Caparica, 2829-511 Caparica, Portugal)

  • Carla Rodrigues

    (Iscte—Instituto Universitário de Lisboa, CIES-Iscte, 1649-026 Lisbon, Portugal
    Department of Sociology, University of Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 166, 1018 WV Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

  • Ana Isabel Fernandes

    (CiiEM—Egas Moniz Interdisciplinary Research Center, Egas Moniz School of Health and Science, Quinta da Granja, Monte de Caparica, 2829-511 Caparica, Portugal)

Abstract

This article discusses results from a sociological study on (i) the sources and use of information on medicines and/or supplements and (ii) the self-assessment of how informed participants were about the last medicine or supplement they purchased. It seeks to demonstrate the plurality of information sources (expert and lay) that individuals call upon—with which they build up their medication literacy—and their perception of the information they have. While these social components of literacy are scarcely visible in available studies, the need to produce knowledge on them is a requisite for a more laypeople-centred approach in public policies seeking to promote medication literacy. A questionnaire was applied in-person (n = 1107) in urban pharmacies in Lisbon and Porto (Portugal). Results show expert information (medical and pharmaceutical) as the dominant reference, followed by lay sources (family/friends/colleagues), while digital sources were less valued than interpersonal ones. This interpersonal dimension was a relevant factor in the building of trust in information. The self-assessment of the information on medication was higher in functional literacy and lower in comprehensive literacy. Studies on medication literacy are particularly relevant in the current context of the expansion and diversification of medicines’ use and of individuals’ growing autonomy in their consumption habits.

Suggested Citation

  • Noémia Lopes & Elsa Pegado & Catarina Egreja & Carla Rodrigues & Ana Isabel Fernandes, 2023. "Medicines and Medication Literacy: Social Practices and Use of Information," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-15, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:12:y:2023:i:7:p:392-:d:1186901
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/12/7/392/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/12/7/392/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:12:y:2023:i:7:p:392-:d:1186901. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.