IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v12y2023i7p385-d1183058.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Theorising Gender-Based Violence Policies: A 7P Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Lut Mergaert

    (Yellow Window, 2018 Antwerp, Belgium)

  • Marcela Linková

    (Institute of Sociology, Czech Academy of Sciences, 110 00 Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Sofia Strid

    (Department of Sociology and Work Science, University of Gothenburg, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden
    Centre for Feminist Social Studies, School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences, Örebro University, 701 82 Örebro, Sweden)

Abstract

This paper presents and critically interrogates a comprehensive 7Ps framework for analysing and addressing gender-based violence. It takes the UN and the Council of Europe’s models as points of departure and develops the framework beyond the current state of the art, explains its different components, and offers reflections on its use in the practice of gender-based violence research. The UN 3P model, encompassing prevention, protection, and prosecution, later developed by the Council of Europe’s Istanbul Convention into a 4P model, comprising prevention, protection, prosecution, and integrated policies, has since been revisited, elaborated upon, and expanded in work focusing on gender-based violence in particular domains, such as female genital mutilation or gender-based violence in sport. To study gender-based violence in academia, the comprehensive 7Ps analytical framework has been deployed to interrogate the policies in place at national and institutional levels, including sexual harassment. Based on empirical data and conceptual analysis in the EU project UniSAFE: Gender-based violence and institutional responses: Building a knowledge base and operational tools to make universities and research organisations safe (2021–2024), the paper argues that the refined 7Ps model, comprising Prevalence, Prevention, Protection, Prosecution of offenders (and disciplinary measures), Provision of services, Partnerships between actors, and Policies specifically addressing the issue, allows for a more encompassing approach, in turn allowing a more fine-grained understanding of variations and explanations for success (or lack thereof) in terms of outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Lut Mergaert & Marcela Linková & Sofia Strid, 2023. "Theorising Gender-Based Violence Policies: A 7P Framework," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-13, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:12:y:2023:i:7:p:385-:d:1183058
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/12/7/385/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/12/7/385/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Callaghan, Sean, 2023. "Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting (FGM/C) in the United States. A study of the prevalence, distribution, and impact of FGM/C in the U.S., 2015-2019," OSF Preprints 7a9c3, Center for Open Science.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:12:y:2023:i:7:p:385-:d:1183058. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.