IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v12y2023i7p366-d1177520.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Concept and Measurement of Interpersonal Violence in Specialist Services Data: Inconsistencies, Outcomes and the Challenges of Synthesising Evidence

Author

Listed:
  • Annie Bunce

    (Violence and Society Centre, University of London, London EC1V 0HB, UK
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Sophie Carlisle

    (Department of Health Service and Population Research, David Goldberg Centre, King’s College London, London SE5 8AF, UK
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Estela Capelas Barbosa

    (Violence and Society Centre, University of London, London EC1V 0HB, UK)

Abstract

Interpersonal violence comprises a variety of different types of violence that occur between individuals, including violence perpetrated by strangers and acquaintances, intimate partners and family members. Interpersonal violence is a leading cause of death, particularly among young adults. Inconsistencies in definitions and approaches to the measurement of interpersonal violence mean it is difficult to clearly understand its prevalence and the differences and similarities between its different subcategories and contexts. In the UK, specialist services provide support for victim-survivors and also perpetrators of violence. As well as delivering frontline services, specialist services collect data on interpersonal violence, both routinely and for the purpose of research and evaluation. This data has the potential to greatly improve understanding of violence in the UK; however, several issues make this challenging. This review describes and discusses some of the key challenges facing the two types of data collected by specialist services. Key inconsistencies regarding conceptualisation and measurement are identified, along with the implications of these for the synthesis of data, including implications for researchers, service providers, funders and commissioners. Recommendations are proposed to improve practice, the quality of data and, therefore, the understanding of interpersonal violence in the UK.

Suggested Citation

  • Annie Bunce & Sophie Carlisle & Estela Capelas Barbosa, 2023. "The Concept and Measurement of Interpersonal Violence in Specialist Services Data: Inconsistencies, Outcomes and the Challenges of Synthesising Evidence," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-15, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:12:y:2023:i:7:p:366-:d:1177520
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/12/7/366/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/12/7/366/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:12:y:2023:i:7:p:366-:d:1177520. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.