IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v12y2023i6p348-d1169492.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Decade of Decision Making: Prosecutorial Decision Making in Sexual Assault Cases

Author

Listed:
  • Ashley K. Fansher

    (Department of Criminal Justice, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND 58202, USA)

  • Bethany Welsh

    (Department of Psychology, University of Houston-Victoria, Victoria, TX 77901, USA)

Abstract

In the United States, it is estimated that fewer than 30% of sexual assaults are reported to law enforcement, less than 5% will result in an arrest, and approximately 3% will result in a felony conviction. The present study examines a census of sexual assault reports from 2012 to 2020 in a large police department in the Midwest region of the United States, considering only those cases presented to the district attorney’s office for consideration ( n = 700). Victim characteristics, suspect characteristics, and incident characteristics were examined as relating to a prosecutor accepting a case for charges. Further, a series of “ideal victim” characteristics were identified and used to create an additive scale based on prior research. The most significant predictors of prosecutor acceptance in the full sample were a lack of “date rape” drugs, continued cooperation from the victim, the suspect having a prior arrest for sexual assault, and the assault being reported within 24 h of occurring. A separate model was conducted for only those cases with continued cooperation from the victim. The researchers discuss the implications of these significant factors and suggest training to change false perceptions of victims among criminal justice officials and to increase victim reporting/cooperation in cases of sexual assault.

Suggested Citation

  • Ashley K. Fansher & Bethany Welsh, 2023. "A Decade of Decision Making: Prosecutorial Decision Making in Sexual Assault Cases," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-23, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:12:y:2023:i:6:p:348-:d:1169492
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/12/6/348/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/12/6/348/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:12:y:2023:i:6:p:348-:d:1169492. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.