IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v12y2023i4p248-d1127496.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Agency and the Limits of Responsibility: Co-Management of Technology-Enabled Care in Supported Housing

Author

Listed:
  • Regina C. Serpa

    (Department of Sociology, Social Policy & Criminology, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK)

  • Steve Rolfe

    (Department of Sociology, Social Policy & Criminology, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK)

  • Grant Gibson

    (Department of Sociology, Social Policy & Criminology, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK)

  • Julia Lawrence

    (Department of Sociology, Social Policy & Criminology, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK)

  • Vikki McCall

    (Department of Sociology, Social Policy & Criminology, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK)

Abstract

Since at least 2012, UK housing providers (and policy makers) have introduced policies aimed at developing autonomy and independence among service users, through an agenda sometimes referred to as ‘responsibilisation’. This paper considers the role that technologies play in this agenda, through an analysis of how wellbeing and independence are facilitated amongst older social housing tenants. Based on case studies of four supported housing schemes in England, the research considers the capacity to exercise agency amongst older persons, through their willingness and ability to accept technological interventions, and the role of support networks to facilitate independent living. Using the concept of modalities of agency, the research examines the impact of implementing ‘low-level’ assistive technologies in the home, based on the perspectives of residents and staff. The interventions studied were designed to improve social relationships, promote self-sufficiency and support self-managed care (based on the principle that the most effective projects facilitate individual agency). The research findings identified that residents responded differentially to technology, based on their levels of capability, motivation, reluctance and resistance. Whilst the study demonstrated that small technological innovations could have disproportionately positive impacts in improving wellbeing, the research demonstrates the complex nature of agency and limits of responsibility. The paper argues that responsibilisation is part of a wider neoliberal project, where choice and agency are manufactured to create an idealised notion of the autonomous actor (in this case through technology-enabled care). The article argues that a collaborative approach to service provision in which responsibility is shared, via co-managed care, is a more effective means of enhancing agency, than one which advocates a withdrawal of support (in the guise of autonomy).

Suggested Citation

  • Regina C. Serpa & Steve Rolfe & Grant Gibson & Julia Lawrence & Vikki McCall, 2023. "Agency and the Limits of Responsibility: Co-Management of Technology-Enabled Care in Supported Housing," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-13, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:12:y:2023:i:4:p:248-:d:1127496
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/12/4/248/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/12/4/248/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:12:y:2023:i:4:p:248-:d:1127496. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.