IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v12y2023i1p37-d1030936.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Engineering Learning Outcomes: The Possible Balance between the Passion and the Profession

Author

Listed:
  • Diana Dias

    (CIPES—Centre for Research in Higher Education Policies, 4450-227 Matosinhos, Portugal
    Lusofona University, 1749-024 Lisboa, Portugal)

Abstract

What is an engineering student expected to learn to become a competent engineer? Which is most desirable in higher education: hard skills or soft skills? Are there differences between master’s and bachelor’s learning outcomes, or between public or private schools? Previous works point out the relevance of hard rather than soft skills in engineering higher education. The implementation of learning outcomes (LOs) in higher-education curricula has been a common challenge for European educational institutions. Despite the efforts undertaken since the Bologna Declaration, the effective implementation of the learning outcomes paradigm is still in process. This research intends to analyse the LOs proposed in the scope of graduate and postgraduate electrical or computer electrical or computer engineering programs submitted to the Agency for Assessment and Accreditation of Higher Education (A3ES) in Portugal since 2004. Conducting a qualitative analysis, data documents were coded according to the Nusche typology of LOs. The results suggest that cognitive skills are a core dimension in electrical or computer engineering LOs. References to non-cognitive LOs are not representative. Different institution sectors (private vs. public), systems (universities vs. polytechnics), and study cycles (first vs. second vs. integrated master) highlight distinct cognitive and non-cognitive categories in their definition of LOs. The results are discussed in terms of a changing or a recycling paradigm in higher-education practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Diana Dias, 2023. "Engineering Learning Outcomes: The Possible Balance between the Passion and the Profession," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:12:y:2023:i:1:p:37-:d:1030936
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/12/1/37/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/12/1/37/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:12:y:2023:i:1:p:37-:d:1030936. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.