IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v12y2023i12p684-d1299288.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Promises and Pitfalls of Intersectional Politics: The Black Coalition for Rights in Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • Sérgio Costa

    (Lateinamerika-Institut, Freie Universität Berlin, 14197 Berlin, Germany)

  • Flavia Rios

    (Instituto de Ciências Humanas e Filosofia, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói 24210-201, Brazil)

  • Fernando Baldraia

    (Centro Brasileiro de Análise e Planejamento, São Paulo 04015-051, Brazil)

Abstract

Based on evidence collected in a collaborative research project, this article studies the Black Coalition for Rights created in Brazil in 2019. Compared to previous experiences of antiracist struggles in Brazil, the Coalition stands out for its decentralized organization, its ability to convey political content through adequate aesthetic forms, its capillarity in the domestic sphere, and its transnational articulations. Equally striking is its intersectional character understood as both the emphasis on the transversal character of racism and the stress of the interdependent character of social struggles against different forms of inequalities (with regard to gender, race, class, etc.). The Coalition has so far proven to be particularly successful in terms of its mobilization capacity, its public visibility, and its agenda-setting power. According to our preliminary findings, its success can be explained, to a great extent, by its ability to vocalize a broad set of political claims and, consequently, to fill the gap left by other civil society actors demobilized by the far right-wing backlash in Brazil and the pandemic. Since January 2023, in the context of a new progressive government, the Coalition has started facing difficulties in preserving its intersectional and socially encompassing character.

Suggested Citation

  • Sérgio Costa & Flavia Rios & Fernando Baldraia, 2023. "Promises and Pitfalls of Intersectional Politics: The Black Coalition for Rights in Brazil," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-14, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:12:y:2023:i:12:p:684-:d:1299288
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/12/12/684/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/12/12/684/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:12:y:2023:i:12:p:684-:d:1299288. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.