IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v12y2023i11p641-d1284101.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contributions of a “ Brazilianized ” Radical Behaviorist Theory of Subjectivity to the Feminist Debate on Women

Author

Listed:
  • Carolina Laurenti

    (Department of Psychology, State University of Maringá, Maringá 87020-900, Brazil)

Abstract

An essentialist view of gender and an individualistic concept of subjectivity have distanced psychological theories from emancipatory feminist projects. In Brazil, similar to some other psychological orientations, the behavior-analytic field has sought an interface with feminism. The anti-essentialist vein of radical behaviorism underpins the early movement toward feminism. This essay aims to expand the area of contact with feminism through a theoretical proposal for understanding women’s subjectivity inspired by Brazilian behavior-analytic literature. From a contextualized, multidimensional, pluralized, and politicized view of subjectivity, women’s subjectivation is forged in a tripartite complex of body, person, and “self”, whose relative unity is susceptible to changes and conflicts. In a patriarchal, racist, and cis-heteronormative society, such as the Brazilian one, subjectivation is also an oppressive process. Nevertheless, the essay demonstrates that women’s subjectivation can be a process of emancipatory liberation. This possibility is glimpsed within a virtuous dialectical circuit between disruptive verbal communities (uncommitted to institutional, hierarchical, and oppressive social control) and subversive subjectivities. Thus, behavior-analytic psychology has theoretical tools to situate the process of women’s subjectivation not as a locus of depoliticization but as a crucial ally in constructing a more equitable and just society, as envisioned by feminism.

Suggested Citation

  • Carolina Laurenti, 2023. "Contributions of a “ Brazilianized ” Radical Behaviorist Theory of Subjectivity to the Feminist Debate on Women," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-17, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:12:y:2023:i:11:p:641-:d:1284101
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/12/11/641/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/12/11/641/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:12:y:2023:i:11:p:641-:d:1284101. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.