IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v11y2022i2p61-d744255.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing and Predicting Inconsistency on Positive and Negative Life Experiences Reports: Which Variables Matter?

Author

Listed:
  • Vanessa Azevedo

    (Faculty of Human and Social Sciences, University Fernando Pessoa, 4240-004 Porto, Portugal)

  • Carla Martins

    (School of Psychology, University of Minho, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal)

  • Ângela Maia

    (School of Psychology, University of Minho, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal)

Abstract

Most studies about life experiences and their long-term impact have relied on retrospective assessments and cross-sectional designs. However, there are concerns about the inconsistency of reports, which have been addressed in a limited scope. This study aimed to compare differences on inconsistency between positive and negative experiences to describe potential patterns and to identify sociodemographic, experiences-related and design-related predictors of inconsistency. Adults from community ( N = 171) reported their life experiences twice, through self-report or interview. An overall trend of overreporting was found for positive and negative experiences. Additionally, inconsistency on positive experiences was higher than on negative although both variables were correlated. Regarding predictors of inconsistency, the model explained greater variance for negative experiences than for the positive ones. Nevertheless, most variables did not predict inconsistency, with few exceptions: impact for positive experiences, total of experiences for negative experiences, and time interval was marginally significant for both. Available data comparing inconsistency on positive and negative experiences as well as associated predictors are incipient. Overall, it seems that we know more about variables not involved in inconsistency than those that matter. Due to its relevancy, this issue should be further examined.

Suggested Citation

  • Vanessa Azevedo & Carla Martins & Ângela Maia, 2022. "Comparing and Predicting Inconsistency on Positive and Negative Life Experiences Reports: Which Variables Matter?," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-11, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:11:y:2022:i:2:p:61-:d:744255
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/11/2/61/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/11/2/61/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:11:y:2022:i:2:p:61-:d:744255. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.