IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v11y2022i12p546-d984049.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

City of Skywalks: Exploring Hong Kong’s Public Space and Power of Discourse from Footbridges

Author

Listed:
  • Stephanie Kwan Nga Lam

    (Faculty of Social Sciences, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong)

  • Andrew Yu

    (College of Arts, Humanities & Social Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9JU, UK)

Abstract

As a public space and building, the footbridge is not just a physical concrete building but also carries people’s life experiences and beliefs. In Hong Kong, however, footbridges are a joint product of the government and property developers to control people and drive consumption. Taking the footbridge as an example, this article explores the relationship between public space and the power of discourse. The article first discusses how the government and property developers manipulate footbridges as a social control tool. This article draws on case studies of the use of public space during and after Hong Kong’s social movements in 2019 to discuss how people tried to regain their power of discourse in urban space, and how the government and the bourgeoisie suppressed such attempts. This paper argues that footbridges serve as marginal spaces, and demonstrate power and control by providing a space for people to discuss public affairs and be used to demonstrate power and control, especially in social movements. The footbridges traditionally used are challenged in a social event at the same time, brought under the gaze of planning and management from authorities, on the meaning of public space, the footbridges are narrowed or even prohibited in Hong Kong.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephanie Kwan Nga Lam & Andrew Yu, 2022. "City of Skywalks: Exploring Hong Kong’s Public Space and Power of Discourse from Footbridges," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-13, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:11:y:2022:i:12:p:546-:d:984049
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/11/12/546/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/11/12/546/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:11:y:2022:i:12:p:546-:d:984049. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.