IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v11y2022i11p514-d970464.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Link between Family Violence and Animal Cruelty: A Scoping Review

Author

Listed:
  • Camie A. Tomlinson

    (School of Social Work, Virginia Commonwealth University, 1000 Floyd Ave., Richmond, VA 23284, USA)

  • Jennifer L. Murphy

    (School of Social Work, Virginia Commonwealth University, 1000 Floyd Ave., Richmond, VA 23284, USA)

  • Angela Matijczak

    (School of Social Work, Virginia Commonwealth University, 1000 Floyd Ave., Richmond, VA 23284, USA)

  • Allegra Califano

    (Department of Psychology, Long Island University, Brooklyn, NY 11201, USA)

  • Jiaxin Santos

    (New York State Psychiatric Institute, 1051 Riverside Dr., New York, NY 10032, USA)

  • Shelby E. McDonald

    (Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, 806 West Franklin St., Richmond, VA 23284, USA)

Abstract

There is some evidence that family violence (intimate partner violence, child maltreatment, elder abuse) co-occurs with animal cruelty (i.e., threats to and/or actual harm of an animal), which is often referred to as “the link.” The aim of this scoping review was to comprehensively search the literature to determine the extent of empirical evidence that supports the co-occurrence of family violence and animal cruelty and that provides prevalence rates of the co-occurrence. We searched eight electronic databases (e.g., Academic Search Complete, PsycArticles, PubMed) for peer-reviewed articles published until September 2021. Articles were eligible for inclusion if they were written in English and included the empirical study of at least one form of family violence and animal cruelty. We identified 61 articles for inclusion. The majority of articles ( n = 48) focused on co-occurring IPV and animal cruelty, and 20 articles examined child maltreatment and animal cruelty. No articles examining elder abuse and animal cruelty were found. Prevalence rates of “the link” ranged from <1% to >80%. Findings regarding the association between family violence and animal cruelty varied. Some studies found that family violence was significantly associated with animal cruelty (or vice versa), but there was also evidence that the association was not statistically significant. Associations between family violence and animal cruelty were not significant in most studies that adjusted for sociodemographic factors. This suggests that sociodemographic factors (e.g., exposure to multiple forms of violence, and income) may explain the co-occurrence of family violence and animal cruelty. Based on the results of our scoping review, we recommend that caution should be taken regarding assertions of “the link” without further research to better understand the co-occurrence of family violence and animal cruelty and the factors and mechanisms that influence their co-occurrence.

Suggested Citation

  • Camie A. Tomlinson & Jennifer L. Murphy & Angela Matijczak & Allegra Califano & Jiaxin Santos & Shelby E. McDonald, 2022. "The Link between Family Violence and Animal Cruelty: A Scoping Review," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-54, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:11:y:2022:i:11:p:514-:d:970464
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/11/11/514/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/11/11/514/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brinda Jegatheesan & Marie-Jose Enders-Slegers & Elizabeth Ormerod & Paula Boyden, 2020. "Understanding the Link between Animal Cruelty and Family Violence: The Bioecological Systems Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-22, April.
    2. Phil Arkow, 2021. "“Humane Criminology”: An Inclusive Victimology Protecting Animals and People," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-21, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aubrey H. Fine, 2020. "The Psycho-Social Impact of Human-Animal Interactions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-4, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:11:y:2022:i:11:p:514-:d:970464. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.