IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v11y2022i11p506-d962968.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“Digging Deeper” Advocate Researchers’ Views on Advocacy and Inclusive Research

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Hopkins

    (Clare Inclusive Research Group—Brothers of Charity, Clare Services, V95 Y2T8 Ennis, County Clare, Ireland)

  • Gerard Minogue

    (Clare Inclusive Research Group—Brothers of Charity, Clare Services, V95 Y2T8 Ennis, County Clare, Ireland)

  • Joseph McGrath

    (Clare Inclusive Research Group—Brothers of Charity, Clare Services, V95 Y2T8 Ennis, County Clare, Ireland)

  • Lisa Jayne Acheson

    (Clare Inclusive Research Group—Brothers of Charity, Clare Services, V95 Y2T8 Ennis, County Clare, Ireland)

  • Pauline Concepta Skehan

    (Clare Inclusive Research Group—Brothers of Charity, Clare Services, V95 Y2T8 Ennis, County Clare, Ireland)

  • Orla Marie McMahon

    (Clare Inclusive Research Group—Brothers of Charity, Clare Services, V95 Y2T8 Ennis, County Clare, Ireland)

  • Brian Hogan

    (Clare Inclusive Research Group—Brothers of Charity, Clare Services, V95 Y2T8 Ennis, County Clare, Ireland)

Abstract

We are the Clare Inclusive Research Group (CIRG) a group of advocates with a learning disability, funded by the Irish support agency the Brothers of Charity (B.O.C.), Clare Services. As a long-established inclusive research group we were approached to reflect on our journey as advocates and researchers. In this article we talk about our work, challenging and helping repeal discriminating Irish law regarding intimate relationships. We then talk about our understanding of advocacy and inclusive research and make recommendations to make this work more effective. Method: As a group of members of CIRG, with the coordinator of the group, we developed this article using online Zoom discussion calls to identify themes, circulating online explanations of drafts followed by Zoom reflections and finally responding to academic reviews. The direct comments made by us as advocate researchers have been retained as they were expressed. Conclusions, Limitations and recommendations: One of our team remarked “advocacy and inclusive research are twins”. We concluded that they are very close but not identical. Our work together on this article led us to create a discussion paper, Manifesto for Inclusive Research. This was adopted as a touchstone for presentations at the first webinar roundtable of the newly formed Inclusive Research IASSID Special Interest Research Group in March 2022. In it we set out guidelines for creating inclusive research which require accessible information and valuing our input in terms that match our status as experts by experience in inclusive research. We challenge academic inclusive researchers who explore the world of intellectual disability to stand shoulder to shoulder with advocate inclusive researchers. Through our work together, we aim to create more fulfilling lives for us all.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Hopkins & Gerard Minogue & Joseph McGrath & Lisa Jayne Acheson & Pauline Concepta Skehan & Orla Marie McMahon & Brian Hogan, 2022. "“Digging Deeper” Advocate Researchers’ Views on Advocacy and Inclusive Research," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-19, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:11:y:2022:i:11:p:506-:d:962968
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/11/11/506/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/11/11/506/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:11:y:2022:i:11:p:506-:d:962968. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.