IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v10y2021i7p258-d590269.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Employee Preparedness for Industry 4.0 in Logistic Sector: A Cross-National Study between Poland and Malaysia

Author

Listed:
  • Beata Ślusarczyk

    (Faculty of Management, Czestochowa University of Technology, 42-200 Częstochowa, Poland
    College of Business and Economics, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg 2006, South Africa)

  • Robert Jeyakumar Nathan

    (Faculty of Business, Multimedia University, Cyberjaya 75450, Malaysia)

  • Paula Pypłacz

    (Faculty of Management, Czestochowa University of Technology, 42-200 Częstochowa, Poland)

Abstract

Today we are witnessing a paradigm shift when it comes to the industry. There are chances that Industry 4.0 does not only involve major changes in production and business solutions, but also the ability of many enterprises (mainly production companies) to come closer to developed economies. This article highlights the aspect of creating new business models that integrate organizations around Industry 4.0 solutions and create new value for the client and internal client. The objective of this study was to demonstrate the relationship between the implementation of selected Industry 4.0 technologies as well as the knowledge and preparation of employees for changes caused by new solutions, e.g., in the area of the automation and robotization of industry or data and information management. The questionnaire research was conducted among 80 logistics companies in Poland and 80 in Malaysia. Based on the obtained data, a statistical analysis was conducted of the relationships between the above-mentioned variables. The analysis concerned: the employees’ knowledge of the Industry 4.0 paradigm, preparing employees for challenges and the implementation of Industry 4.0 technology. The correlation analysis showed the existence of a statistical relationship between the analysed variables. The analysis of quantitative data showed differences between Poland and Malaysia in terms of employee preparation, their knowledge of Industry 4.0 and activities related to the implementation of specific IR4.0 technologies. The presented analysis relates to one of the analysed areas, therefore it is a contribution to further considerations and comparisons.

Suggested Citation

  • Beata Ślusarczyk & Robert Jeyakumar Nathan & Paula Pypłacz, 2021. "Employee Preparedness for Industry 4.0 in Logistic Sector: A Cross-National Study between Poland and Malaysia," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-14, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:10:y:2021:i:7:p:258-:d:590269
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/10/7/258/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/10/7/258/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gudanowska Alicja Ewa & Alonso Josune Prieto & Törmänen Annamari, 2018. "What competencies are needed in the production industry? The case of the Podlaskie Region," Engineering Management in Production and Services, Sciendo, vol. 10(1), pages 65-74, March.
    2. Fernando E. García-Muiña & María Sonia Medina-Salgado & Anna Maria Ferrari & Marco Cucchi, 2020. "Sustainability Transition in Industry 4.0 and Smart Manufacturing with the Triple-Layered Business Model Canvas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-19, March.
    3. Beata SLUSARCZYK & Adnan UL HAQUE, 2019. "Public Services For Business Environment: Challenges For Implementing Industry 4.0 In Polish And Canadian Logistic Enterprises," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2019(33), pages 57-76, December.
    4. Sebastian Saniuk & Sandra Grabowska & Bożena Gajdzik, 2020. "Social Expectations and Market Changes in the Context of Developing the Industry 4.0 Concept," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nadeem, Kashif & Wong, Sut I. & Za, Stefano & Venditti, Michelina, 2024. "Digital transformation and industry 4.0 employees: Empirical evidence from top digital nations," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Radosław Miśkiewicz & Radosław Wolniak, 2020. "Practical Application of the Industry 4.0 Concept in a Steel Company," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-21, July.
    2. Roberto Hernández-Chea & Akriti Jain & Nancy M. P. Bocken & Anjula Gurtoo, 2021. "The Business Model in Sustainability Transitions: A Conceptualization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-25, May.
    3. Panagiotis Stavropoulos & Alexios Papacharalampopoulos & Konstantinos Tzimanis & Demetris Petrides & George Chryssolouris, 2021. "On the Relationship between Circular and Innovation Approach to Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-16, October.
    4. Rok Črešnar & Zlatko Nedelko, 2020. "Understanding Future Leaders: How Are Personal Values of Generations Y and Z Tailored to Leadership in Industry 4.0?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-19, May.
    5. Bożena Gajdzik & Sandra Grabowska & Sebastian Saniuk & Tadeusz Wieczorek, 2020. "Sustainable Development and Industry 4.0: A Bibliometric Analysis Identifying Key Scientific Problems of the Sustainable Industry 4.0," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-27, August.
    6. Catherine Maware & David M. Parsley, 2023. "Can Industry 4.0 Assist Lean Manufacturing in Attaining Sustainability over Time? Evidence from the US Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-23, January.
    7. Xiaoxia Chen & Mélanie Despeisse & Björn Johansson, 2020. "Environmental Sustainability of Digitalization in Manufacturing: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-31, December.
    8. Stephany Isabel Vallarta-Serrano & Edgar Santoyo-Castelazo & Edgar Santoyo & Esther O. García-Mandujano & Holkan Vázquez-Sánchez, 2023. "Integrated Sustainability Assessment Framework of Industry 4.0 from an Energy Systems Thinking Perspective: Bibliometric Analysis and Systematic Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-30, July.
    9. Marco Vacchi & Cristina Siligardi & Erika Iveth Cedillo-González & Anna Maria Ferrari & Davide Settembre-Blundo, 2021. "Industry 4.0 and Smart Data as Enablers of the Circular Economy in Manufacturing: Product Re-Engineering with Circular Eco-Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-20, September.
    10. Sebastian Saniuk & Sandra Grabowska & Bożena Gajdzik, 2020. "Personalization of Products in the Industry 4.0 Concept and Its Impact on Achieving a Higher Level of Sustainable Consumption," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-19, November.
    11. Radosław Drozd & Radosław Wolniak, 2021. "Metrisable assessment of the course of stream-systemic processes in vector form in industry 4.0," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 55(6), pages 2161-2176, December.
    12. Priyanshu Kumar Singh & R. Maheswaran, 2024. "Analysis of social barriers to sustainable innovation and digitisation in supply chain," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 5223-5248, February.
    13. Marco Vacchi & Cristina Siligardi & Fabio Demaria & Erika Iveth Cedillo-González & Rocío González-Sánchez & Davide Settembre-Blundo, 2021. "Technological Sustainability or Sustainable Technology? A Multidimensional Vision of Sustainability in Manufacturing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-18, September.
    14. Georgescu Irina & Androniceanu Ane-Mari & Kinnunen Jani & Drăgulănescu Irina Virginia, 2021. "Correlative approach to digitalization and economic growth," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 15(1), pages 44-57, December.
    15. Piotr Kordel & Radosław Wolniak, 2021. "Technology Entrepreneurship and the Performance of Enterprises in the Conditions of Covid-19 Pandemic: The Fuzzy Set Analysis of Waste to Energy Enterprises in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-22, June.
    16. Krzysztof Ejsmont, 2021. "The Impact of Industry 4.0 on Employees—Insights from Australia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-31, March.
    17. Sandra Grabowska & Sebastian Saniuk & Bożena Gajdzik, 2022. "Industry 5.0: improving humanization and sustainability of Industry 4.0," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(6), pages 3117-3144, June.
    18. Cristina Ciliberto & Katarzyna Szopik‐Depczyńska & Małgorzata Tarczyńska‐Łuniewska & Alessandro Ruggieri & Giuseppe Ioppolo, 2021. "Enabling the Circular Economy transition: a sustainable lean manufacturing recipe for Industry 4.0," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(7), pages 3255-3272, November.
    19. Mariusz J. Ligarski & Barbara Rożałowska & Krzysztof Kalinowski, 2021. "A Study of the Human Factor in Industry 4.0 Based on the Automotive Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-20, October.
    20. Negrete, Moira & Fuentes, Marcelo & Kraslawski, Andrzej & Irarrazaval, Felipe & Herrera-León, Sebastián, 2024. "Socio-environmental implications of the decarbonization of copper and lithium mining and mineral processing," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:10:y:2021:i:7:p:258-:d:590269. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.