IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v10y2021i6p204-d566458.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“I Will Not Be Dona Maria”: Rethinking Exploitation and Objectification in the Context of Work and Sex Work

Author

Listed:
  • Thaddeus Blanchette

    (Instituto de Biodiversidade e Sustenabilidade, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Macaé 27965-045, Brazil)

  • Ana Paula Da Silva

    (Eduação do Campo, Federal Fluminense University, Santo Antônio de Pâdua 20241-260, Brazil)

  • Gustavo Camargo

    (Instituto de Biodiversidade e Sustenabilidade, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Macaé 27965-045, Brazil)

Abstract

In many feminist and sociological accounts of sex work, the concept of exploitation resides on the subjacent notion of objectification, codified in the omnipresent belief that the sex worker sells their body. Sexual objectification supposedly indicates the peculiar and particular effect that sex work is supposed to have on the bodies of human beings involved in this form of toil, being one of the keystones for the belief that sex work is inherently exploitative. In the present article, we intend to investigate the canonical concept of objectification and its (ab)uses in the light of a comparative ethnographic study of sex work and other jobs in the service economy in the cities of Rio de Janeiro (Brazil) and New Orleans (USA). Our argument is that the concept of sexual objectification has its roots in pre-capitalist morality, encoded in Kantian philosophy, that is hardly applicable to real life in the 21st century. A more general and intersectional understanding of objectification and agency in the broader field of engendered labor relations is necessary for us to understand why people choose to engage in sex work, why laws which see sex work as synonymous with exploitation and slavery must be rethought, and how they might be rethought.

Suggested Citation

  • Thaddeus Blanchette & Ana Paula Da Silva & Gustavo Camargo, 2021. "“I Will Not Be Dona Maria”: Rethinking Exploitation and Objectification in the Context of Work and Sex Work," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-18, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:10:y:2021:i:6:p:204-:d:566458
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/10/6/204/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/10/6/204/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:10:y:2021:i:6:p:204-:d:566458. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.