IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v10y2021i5p170-d554215.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Credibility of Digital Political News in Spain: Comparison between Traditional Media and Social Media

Author

Listed:
  • Reinald Besalú

    (Department of Communication, Barcelona School of Management, Pompeu Fabra University, 08002 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Carles Pont-Sorribes

    (Department of Communication, Barcelona School of Management, Pompeu Fabra University, 08002 Barcelona, Spain)

Abstract

In the context of the dissemination of fake news and the traditional media outlets’ loss of centrality, the credibility of digital news emerges as a key factor for today’s democracies. The main goal of this paper was to identify the levels of credibility that Spanish citizens assign to political news in the online environment. A national survey ( n = 1669) was designed to assess how the news format affected credibility and likelihood of sharing. Four different news formats were assessed, two of them linked to traditional media (digital newspapers and digital television) and two to social media (Facebook and WhatsApp). Four experimental groups assigned a credibility score and a likelihood of sharing score to four different political news items presented in the aforementioned digital formats. The comparison between the mean credibility scores assigned to the same news item presented in different formats showed significant differences among groups, as did the likelihood of sharing the news. News items shown in a traditional media format, especially digital television, were assigned more credibility than news presented in a social media format, and participants were also more likely to share the former, revealing a more cautious attitude towards social media as a source of news.

Suggested Citation

  • Reinald Besalú & Carles Pont-Sorribes, 2021. "Credibility of Digital Political News in Spain: Comparison between Traditional Media and Social Media," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-18, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:10:y:2021:i:5:p:170-:d:554215
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/10/5/170/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/10/5/170/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:10:y:2021:i:5:p:170-:d:554215. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.