IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v10y2021i4p133-d533139.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

European Muslim Youth and Gender (in)Equality Discourse: Towards a More Critical Academic Inquiry

Author

Listed:
  • Colleen Boland

    (Public Law, Faculty of Law, Autonomous University of Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain)

Abstract

In Europe, gender equality can be framed as a secular value, juxtaposed against affiliation with and practice of Islam. Academic and public debate has either given special attention to the spread of religious fundamentalism in Europe, or to the way Muslim women dress, citing how both purportedly jeopardize gender equality. This is despite findings that a link between gender equality and religiosity or practice of Islam is neither inherent nor circumscribed. Moreover, it is possible to demonstrate that such discourse rests on implicitly racialized conceptualizations of the Muslim “other”. Meanwhile, Muslim youth in particular are benchmarked against these imagined standards of gender equality, as compared with non-Muslim peers. This work examines ways in which normative secular frameworks and discourses, taking ownership of gender equality narratives, have shaped Europe’s academic inquiry regarding Muslim youth. It notes what is absent in this inquiry, including intersections of race and class, which remain divorced from the limited conversation on gender and religious difference. A reflexive, intersectional approach to this discussion, conscious of the importance of embedded racial or structural inequality and what is absent in current inquiry, better serves in understanding and navigating power relations that ultimately contribute to multiple exclusion of these youth.

Suggested Citation

  • Colleen Boland, 2021. "European Muslim Youth and Gender (in)Equality Discourse: Towards a More Critical Academic Inquiry," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-15, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:10:y:2021:i:4:p:133-:d:533139
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/10/4/133/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/10/4/133/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mieke Maliepaard & Richard Alba, 2016. "Cultural Integration in the Muslim Second Generation in the Netherlands: The Case of Gender Ideology," International Migration Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(1), pages 70-94, March.
    2. Jenny Rodriguez & Evangelina Holvino & Joyce K. Fletcher & Stella M. Nkomo & Sigtona Halrynjo & Merel Jonker, 2016. "Naming and Framing of Intersectionality in Hijab Cases — Does It Matter? An Analysis of Discrimination Cases in Scandinavia and the Netherlands," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(3), pages 278-295, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martina Crescenti, 2024. "Gender perspectives in the Italian Muslim family: Education, taboos, conflicts, and intergenerational transformations," Academicus International Scientific Journal, Entrepreneurship Training Center Albania, issue 29, pages 100-118, January.
    2. Aurelian-Petruş PLOPEANU & Daniel HOMOCIANU, 2020. "Why would Romanian migrants from Western Europe return to their country of origin? Abstract: After conducting a survey among Romanian individuals left abroad, we analyze the particular influences rela," Eastern Journal of European Studies, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 11, pages 211-235, June.
    3. IGARASHI Akira & ONO Yoshikuni, 2020. "The Effects of Negative and Positive Information on Attitudes toward Immigration," Discussion papers 20023, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    4. Diehl, Claudia & Liebau, Elisabeth & Mühlau, Peter, 2021. "How Often Have You Felt Disadvantaged? Explaining Perceived Discrimination," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 73(1), pages 1-24.
    5. Claudia Diehl & Elisabeth Liebau, 2017. "Perceptions of Discrimination: What Do They Measure and Why Do They Matter?," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 945, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    6. Eman Abdelhadi & Paula England, 2018. "Do Values Explain the Low Employment Levels of Muslim Women Around the World? A Within-and between-Country Analysis," Working Papers 20180015, New York University Abu Dhabi, Department of Social Science, revised Mar 2018.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:10:y:2021:i:4:p:133-:d:533139. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.