IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v10y2021i3p106-d520416.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Chilean Teacher Educators’ Conceptions on the Absence of Women and Their History in Teacher Training Programmes. A Collective Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Jesús Marolla Gajardo

    (Faculty of Education, University of The Americas, Santiago de Chile 8370040, Chile)

  • Jordi Castellví Mata

    (Faculty of Education, International University of La Rioja, 26006 La Rioja, Spain)

  • Rodrigo Mendonça dos Santos

    (Department of Curriculum & Pedagogy, Faculty of Education, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada)

Abstract

Schools must assume a clear position that considers gender perspectives and studies in their programmes’ construction as well as in discourses and practices produced and reproduced in the school context. Social sciences education is a key area that enables the creation of tools to reflect and foster social justice practices in face of violence against women. In this article, we focus on some reflections of social sciences education professors in Chile. Specifically, we discuss the limitations they face to include women and women issues in their classes. The methodology utilised is Collective Case Studies. The methodology used has a socio-constructivist approach and critical theory perspective, seeking to understand the structures of meaning around the invisibility of women and their history. Among the results, the willingness of professors to include and transform their practices towards perspectives that promote inclusion and social justice stands out. However, they have different limitations, such as excessive workload, the tradition already present in teacher education programmes, and the rigidity of the hegemonic and patriarchal structures.

Suggested Citation

  • Jesús Marolla Gajardo & Jordi Castellví Mata & Rodrigo Mendonça dos Santos, 2021. "Chilean Teacher Educators’ Conceptions on the Absence of Women and Their History in Teacher Training Programmes. A Collective Case Study," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-16, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:10:y:2021:i:3:p:106-:d:520416
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/10/3/106/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/10/3/106/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:10:y:2021:i:3:p:106-:d:520416. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.