IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v10y2021i10p374-d651374.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Intergenerational Practice in the Community—What Does the Community Think?

Author

Listed:
  • Gail Kenning

    (fEEL-feltExperience & Empathy Lab., School of Art & Design, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia
    Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia
    Ageing Futures Institute, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia)

  • Nicole Ee

    (Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia
    School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia)

  • Ying Xu

    (Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia
    School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia)

  • Billy L. Luu

    (Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia)

  • Stephanie A. Ward

    (School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia
    Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing, School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia
    Department of Geriatric Medicine, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia)

  • Micah B. Goldwater

    (Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia)

  • Ebony Lewis

    (Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia
    School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia)

  • Katrina Radford

    (Department of Business Strategy and Innovation, Griffith University, Southport, QLD 4222, Australia)

  • Kaarin J. Anstey

    (Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia
    Ageing Futures Institute, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia
    School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia)

  • Nicola T. Lautenschlager

    (Academic Unit for Psychiatry of Old Age, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
    North Western Mental Health, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC 3050, Australia)

  • Janna Anneke Fitzgerald

    (Department of Business Strategy and Innovation, Griffith University, Southport, QLD 4222, Australia)

  • Kenneth Rockwood

    (Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada)

  • Ruth Peters

    (Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia
    Ageing Futures Institute, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia
    School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia)

Abstract

The many changes that occur in the lives of older people put them at an increased risk of being socially isolated and lonely. Intergenerational programs for older adults and young children can potentially address this shortfall, because of the perceived benefit from generations interacting. This study explores whether there is an appetite in the community for intergenerational programs for community dwelling older adults. An online survey was distributed via social media, research team networks, and snowballing recruitment with access provided via QR code or hyperlink. Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with potential participants of a pilot intergenerational program planned for the Eastern Suburbs of Sydney, Australia in 2020. The interviews were thematically analyzed. Over 250 people completed the survey, and 21 interviews took place with older adults (10) and parents of young children (11). The data showed that participants were all in favor of intergenerational programs, but there were different perceptions about who benefits most and how. The study highlighted considerations to be addressed in the development of effective and sustainable intergenerational programs. For example, accessing people in the community who are most socially isolated and lonely was identified as a primary challenge. More evidence-based research is needed to support involvement of different cohorts, such as those who are frail, or living with physical or cognitive limitations.

Suggested Citation

  • Gail Kenning & Nicole Ee & Ying Xu & Billy L. Luu & Stephanie A. Ward & Micah B. Goldwater & Ebony Lewis & Katrina Radford & Kaarin J. Anstey & Nicola T. Lautenschlager & Janna Anneke Fitzgerald & Ken, 2021. "Intergenerational Practice in the Community—What Does the Community Think?," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-30, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:10:y:2021:i:10:p:374-:d:651374
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/10/10/374/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/10/10/374/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:10:y:2021:i:10:p:374-:d:651374. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.