IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jrisks/v13y2025i5p82-d1641336.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Neural Network Approach for Pricing Correlated Health Risks

Author

Listed:
  • Alessandro G. Laporta

    (Department of Statistics, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Roma, Italy)

  • Susanna Levantesi

    (Department of Statistics, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Roma, Italy)

  • Lea Petrella

    (MEMOTEF Department, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Roma, Italy)

Abstract

In recent years, the actuarial literature involving machine learning in insurance pricing has flourished. However, most actuarial machine learning research focuses on property and casualty insurance, while using such techniques in health insurance is yet to be explored. In this paper, we discuss the use of neural networks to set the price of health insurance coverage following the structure of a classical frequency-severity model. In particular, we propose negative multinomial neural networks to jointly model the frequency of possibly correlated medical claims and Gamma neural networks to estimate the expected claim severity. Using a case study based on real-world health insurance data, we highlight the overall better performance of the neural network models with respect to more established regression models, both in terms of accuracy (frequency models achieve an average out-of-sample deviance of 8.54 compared to 8.61 for classical regressions) and risk diversification, as indicated by the ABC lift metric, which is 5.62 × 10 − 3 for neural networks versus 8.27 × 10 − 3 for traditional models.

Suggested Citation

  • Alessandro G. Laporta & Susanna Levantesi & Lea Petrella, 2025. "A Neural Network Approach for Pricing Correlated Health Risks," Risks, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-28, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:13:y:2025:i:5:p:82-:d:1641336
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/13/5/82/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/13/5/82/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Denuit, Michel & Sznajder, Dominik & Trufin, Julien, 2019. "Model selection based on Lorenz and concentration curves, Gini indices and convex order," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 128-139.
    2. Alex Jose & Angus S. Macdonald & George Tzougas & George Streftaris, 2022. "A Combined Neural Network Approach for the Prediction of Admission Rates Related to Respiratory Diseases," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-35, November.
    3. Edward Frees & Jie Gao & Marjorie Rosenberg, 2011. "Predicting the Frequency and Amount of Health Care Expenditures," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 377-392.
    4. Denuit, Michel & Lang, Stefan, 2004. "Non-life rate-making with Bayesian GAMs," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 627-647, December.
    5. Denuit, Michel & Sznajder, Dominik & Trufin, Julien, 2019. "Model selection based on Lorenz and concentration curves, Gini indices and convex order," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2019006, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    6. I. Duncan & M. Loginov & M. Ludkovski, 2016. "Testing Alternative Regression Frameworks for Predictive Modeling of Health Care Costs," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 65-87, January.
    7. Denuit, Michel & Sznajder, Dominik & Trufin, Julien, 2019. "Model selection based on Lorenz and concentration curves, Gini indices and convex order," LIDAM Reprints ISBA 2019046, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yves Staudt & Joël Wagner, 2021. "Assessing the Performance of Random Forests for Modeling Claim Severity in Collision Car Insurance," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-28, March.
    2. Jolien Ponnet & Robin Van Oirbeek & Tim Verdonck, 2021. "Concordance Probability for Insurance Pricing Models," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-26, October.
    3. Denuit, Michel & Trufin, Julien, 2022. "Autocalibration by balance correction in nonlife insurance pricing," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2022041, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    4. Aktaev, Nurken E. & Bannova, K.A., 2022. "Mathematical modeling of probability distribution of money by means of potential formation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 595(C).
    5. Michel Denuit & Christian Y. Robert, 2021. "Risk sharing under the dominant peer‐to‐peer property and casualty insurance business models," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 24(2), pages 181-205, June.
    6. Denuit, Michel & Robert, Christian Y., 2021. "Risk sharing under the dominant peer-to-peer property and casualty insurance business models," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2021001, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    7. Willame, Gireg & Trufin, Julien & Denuit, Michel, 2023. "Boosted Poisson regression trees: A guide to the BT package in R," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2023008, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    8. Denuit, Michel & Trufin, Julien, 2021. "Lorenz curve, Gini coefficient, and Tweedie dominance for autocalibrated predictors," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2021036, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    9. Denuit, Michel & Charpentier, Arthur & Trufin, Julien, 2021. "Autocalibration and Tweedie-dominance for insurance pricing with machine learning," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(PB), pages 485-497.
    10. Denuit, Michel & Trufin, Julien & Verdebout, Thomas, 2021. "Testing for more positive expectation dependence with application to model comparison," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(PB), pages 163-172.
    11. Wakker, Peter P. & Yang, Jingni, 2021. "Concave/convex weighting and utility functions for risk: A new light on classical theorems," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 429-435.
    12. Denuit, Michel & Charpentier, Arthur & Trufin, Julien, 2021. "Autocalibration and Tweedie-dominance for insurance pricing with machine learning," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2021013, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    13. Michel Denuit & Arthur Charpentier & Julien Trufin, 2021. "Autocalibration and Tweedie-dominance for Insurance Pricing with Machine Learning," Papers 2103.03635, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2021.
    14. Denuit, Michel & Trufin, Julien & Verdebout, Thomas, 2021. "Testing for more positive expectation dependence with application to model comparison," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2021021, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    15. Denuit, Michel & Trufin, Julien, 2022. "Model selection with Pearson’s correlation, concentration and Lorenz curves under autocalibration," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2022033, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    16. Denuit, Michel & Huyghe, Julie & Trufin, Julien & Verdebout, Thomas, 2024. "Testing for auto-calibration with Lorenz and Concentration curves," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 130-139.
    17. Fabio Baione & Davide Biancalana & Paolo De Angelis, 2020. "A Risk Based approach for the Solvency Capital requirement for Health Plans," Papers 2011.09254, arXiv.org.
    18. Denuit, Michel & Trufin, Julien, 2024. "Convex and Lorenz orders under balance correction in nonlife insurance pricing: Review and new developments," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 123-128.
    19. Aivars Spilbergs & Andris Fomins & Māris Krastiņš, 2022. "Multivariate Modelling of Motor Third Party Liability Insurance Claims," European Journal of Business Science and Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Faculty of Business and Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 5-18.
    20. Junhao Liu & Anita Mukherjee, 2021. "Medicaid and long‐term care: The effects of penalizing strategic asset transfers," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 88(1), pages 53-77, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:13:y:2025:i:5:p:82-:d:1641336. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.