IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jrisks/v10y2022i4p79-d789189.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Increasing Importance of Risk Management in the Context of Solid Waste Sphere Reforming in Russian Regions

Author

Listed:
  • Viktoria Degtereva

    (Graduate School of Public Administration, Peter the Great Saint-Petersburg Polytechnic University, 29 Politechnicheskaya Str., 195251 Saint Petersburg, Russia)

  • Maria Liubarskaia

    (Department of State and Territorial Management, Saint-Petersburg State University of Economics, 21 Sadovaya Str., 191023 Saint Petersburg, Russia)

  • Viktoria Merkusheva

    (Department of Engineering Geodesy, Emperor Alexander I Saint-Petersburg State Transport University, 9 Moskovsky Pr., 190031 Saint Petersburg, Russia)

  • Alexey Artemiev

    (Department of Geodesy and Cadastre, Tver State Technical University, 22 Afanasy Nilitin Str., 170026 Tver, Russia)

Abstract

This article analyzes the risk factors influencing the achievement of solid waste sphere reforming goals in Russia. The given arguments present the current state of the reform as not very effective from an economic, environmental, and social perspective. The authors identify four groups of risk factors and put forward, as a critical condition for successful reform, the availability of reliable information, as well as risk management incorporated in the decision-making process. The basis for the research execution was the information from the regional solid waste sphere Master Plans and expert opinions on the readiness to achieve the reform goal regarding 100% MSW sorting based on the staff performance, public awareness, technology availability, and tariff validity assessments. The authors use a decision tree method and MSW sorting system development scenarios to provide the pessimistic and optimistic evaluation on the potential for fulfilling the reform tasks. The conclusions indicate the unattainability of the goals set by the Russian authorities for MSW sorting by 2030. The authors propose to change the status of risk factors through the implementation of certain measures for the transition from a negative to a positive scenario of reforming and to set the realistic goals for MSW sorting in Russia.

Suggested Citation

  • Viktoria Degtereva & Maria Liubarskaia & Viktoria Merkusheva & Alexey Artemiev, 2022. "Increasing Importance of Risk Management in the Context of Solid Waste Sphere Reforming in Russian Regions," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-13, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:10:y:2022:i:4:p:79-:d:789189
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/10/4/79/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/10/4/79/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dmitrii Rodionov & Olesya Perepechko & Olga Nadezhina, 2020. "Determining Economic Security of a Business Based on Valuation of Intangible Assets according to the International Valuation Standards (IVS)," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-14, October.
    2. Samoylik Marina S., 2014. "Economic and ecological optimal strategies of management of the system of regional solid waste disposal," The Problems of Economy, RESEARCH CENTRE FOR INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT PROBLEMS of NAS (KHARKIV, UKRAINE), issue 1, pages 343-349.
    3. Valentina Kravchenko & Tatiana Kudryavtseva & Yuriy Kuporov, 2021. "A Method for Assessing Threats to the Economic Security of a Region: A Case Study of Public Procurement in Russia," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-10, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Awad Ali Alanzi, 2021. "Saudi Procurement System and Regulations: Overview of Local and International Administrative Contracts," Laws, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-15, May.
    2. Huasheng Zhu & Duer Su & Fei Yao, 2022. "Spatio-Temporal Differences in Economic Security of the Prefecture-Level Cities in Qinghai–Tibet Plateau Region of China: Based on a Triple-Dimension Analytical Framework of Economic Geography," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-29, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:10:y:2022:i:4:p:79-:d:789189. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.