IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jresou/v9y2020i11p129-d440454.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rill Erosion and Soil Quality in Forest and Deforested Ecosystems with Different Morphological Characteristics

Author

Listed:
  • Misagh Parhizkar

    (Soil Science Department, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Guilan, Rasht 41635-1314, Iran)

  • Mahmood Shabanpour

    (Soil Science Department, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Guilan, Rasht 41635-1314, Iran)

  • Demetrio Antonio Zema

    (Department AGRARIA, Mediterranean University of Reggio Calabria, Loc. Feo di Vito, I-89122 Reggio Calabria, Italy)

  • Manuel Esteban Lucas-Borja

    (Escuela Técnica Superior Ingenieros Agrónomos y Montes, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Campus Universitario, E-02071 Albacete, Spain)

Abstract

Rill detachment capacity is a key parameter in concentrated flow erosion. Rill erosion generally turns into gully erosion with severe environmental impacts. Changes in land use and human activities can have heavy effects in rill formation, particularly in forests subject to deforestation; soil morphology plays a significant role in these effects. However, literature reports few studies about rill detachment rates and their implications on soil quality in forest and deforested soils with different morphological characteristics. To fill these gaps, this study has evaluated the rill detachment capacity (D c ) and the main soil quality indicators in three areas (upper, middle and lower slope) of forest and deforested (for 10 years) hillslopes exposed to the north and south in Northern Iran. The variations of D c have been measured on soil samples under laboratory conditions through a flume experiment at three slope gradients (12 to 19%) and five flow rates (0.22 to 0.67 L m −1 s −1 ) with four replications. The large and significant ( p < 0.05) difference (about 70%) detected for D c between forest and deforested hillslopes was associated to the higher organic matter content of forest areas; as a consequence, these areas also showed higher aggregate stability, porosity, root weight density, microbial respiration and available water. In the deforested hillslopes exposed to the south, the soil erodibility was higher by 12% compared to those exposed to the north. The differences in the monitored soil quality indicators were instead less noticeable and not always significant ( p < 0.05). Conversely, D c did not significantly change ( p < 0.05) among the upper, middle and lower hillslope areas investigated in this study. Simple but accurate models to predict the rill detachment capacity, erodibility and critical shear stress of soils from indicators of soil quality or the unit stream power using regression equations are suggested. Overall, the results can support land planners in prioritizing the actions for soil conservation in deforested hillslopes exposed to the south as well as in the extensive application of the proposed equations in erosion prediction models.

Suggested Citation

  • Misagh Parhizkar & Mahmood Shabanpour & Demetrio Antonio Zema & Manuel Esteban Lucas-Borja, 2020. "Rill Erosion and Soil Quality in Forest and Deforested Ecosystems with Different Morphological Characteristics," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-24, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:9:y:2020:i:11:p:129-:d:440454
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/9/11/129/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/9/11/129/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zema, Demetrio Antonio & Nicotra, Angelo & Mateos, Luciano & Zimbone, Santo Marcello, 2018. "Improvement of the irrigation performance in Water Users Associations integrating data envelopment analysis and multi-regression models," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 38-49.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Salgado, Ramiro & Mateos, Luciano, 2021. "Evaluation of different methods of estimating ET for the performance assessment of irrigation schemes," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    2. Rocío Poveda-Bautista & Bernat Roig-Merino & Herminia Puerto & Juan Buitrago-Vera, 2021. "Assessment of Irrigation Water Use Efficiency in Citrus Orchards Using AHP," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-14, May.
    3. Demetrio Antonio Zema & Pasquale Filianoti & Daniela D’Agostino & Antonino Labate & Manuel Esteban Lucas-Borja & Angelo Nicotra & Santo Marcello Zimbone, 2020. "Analyzing the Performances of Water User Associations to Increase the Irrigation Sustainability: An Application of Multivariate Statistics to a Case Study in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-18, August.
    4. Jay Nigam & Totakura Bangar Raju & Ramachandra K. Pavan Kumar Pannala, 2023. "Performance Evaluation of Irrigation Canals Using Data Envelopment Analysis for Efficient and Sustainable Irrigation Management in Jharkhand State, India," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-14, July.
    5. Vafaei, Elahe & Shahabi Ahangarkolaee, Saeed & Lucas-Borja, Manuel Esteban & Shabanali Fami, Hossein & Zema, Demetrio Antonio, 2021. "A framework to evaluate the factors influencing groundwater management in Water User Associations: The case study of Tafresh County (Iran)," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    6. Benavides, Juan & Hernández-Plaza, Eva & Mateos, Luciano & Fereres, Elías, 2021. "A global analysis of irrigation scheme water supplies in relation to requirements," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    7. Loureiro, Dália & Beceiro, Paula & Moreira, Madalena & Arranja, Carina & Cordeiro, Diana & Alegre, Helena, 2023. "A comprehensive performance assessment system for diagnosis and decision-support to improve water and energy efficiency and its demonstration in Portuguese collective irrigation systems," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:9:y:2020:i:11:p:129-:d:440454. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.