IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jpubli/v6y2018i4p40-d172052.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Bibliometric Analysis of Cannabis Publications: Six Decades of Research and a Gap on Studies with the Plant

Author

Listed:
  • Cristiane B. D. Matielo

    (Núcleo de Ecologia Molecular e Micropropagação de Plantas, Universidade Federal do Pampa—UNIPAMPA, São Gabriel 97307-020, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil)

  • Deise S. Sarzi

    (Instituto de Bioquímica Médica Leopoldo de Meis—CCS, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro—UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro 21941-902, RJ, Brazil)

  • Beatriz Justolin

    (Núcleo de Ecologia Molecular e Micropropagação de Plantas, Universidade Federal do Pampa—UNIPAMPA, São Gabriel 97307-020, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil)

  • Rafael P. M. Lemos

    (Núcleo de Ecologia Molecular e Micropropagação de Plantas, Universidade Federal do Pampa—UNIPAMPA, São Gabriel 97307-020, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil)

  • Flavio A. O. Camargo

    (Departamento de Solos, Faculdade de Agronomia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul—UFRGS, Porto Alegre 91501-970, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil)

  • Valdir M. Stefenon

    (Núcleo de Ecologia Molecular e Micropropagação de Plantas, Universidade Federal do Pampa—UNIPAMPA, São Gabriel 97307-020, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil)

Abstract

In this study we performed a bibliometric analysis focusing on the general patterns of scientific publications about Cannabis , revealing their trends and limitations. Publications related to Cannabis , released from 1960 to 2017, were retrieved from the Scopus database using six search terms. The search term “Genetics” returned 53.4% of publications, while “forensic genetics” and “traceability” represented 2.3% and 0.1% of the publications, respectively. However, 43.1% of the studies were not directly related to Cannabis and, in some cases, Cannabis was just used as an example in the text. A significant increase in publications was observed after 2001, with most of the publications coming from Europe, followed by North America. Although the term Cannabis was found in the title, abstract, or keywords of 1284 publications, we detected a historical gap in studies on Cannabis . We expect that increasing interest in this issue and the rise of new biotechnological advances will lead to the development of new studies. This study will help scientists identify overall research needs, detect the scientific areas in evidence concerning Cannabis studies, and find excellent centers of investigation for scientific interchange and collaboration.

Suggested Citation

  • Cristiane B. D. Matielo & Deise S. Sarzi & Beatriz Justolin & Rafael P. M. Lemos & Flavio A. O. Camargo & Valdir M. Stefenon, 2018. "A Bibliometric Analysis of Cannabis Publications: Six Decades of Research and a Gap on Studies with the Plant," Publications, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-11, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jpubli:v:6:y:2018:i:4:p:40-:d:172052
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/6/4/40/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/6/4/40/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R. S. Bajwa & K. Yaldram & S. Rafique, 2013. "A scientometric assessment of research output in nanoscience and nanotechnology: Pakistan perspective," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 94(1), pages 333-342, January.
    2. V. M. Stefenon & L. F. W. Roesch & A. B. Pereira, 2013. "Thirty years of Brazilian research in Antarctica: ups, downs and perspectives," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 95(1), pages 325-331, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qing Ji & Xiaoping Pang & Xi Zhao, 2014. "A bibliometric analysis of research on Antarctica during 1993–2012," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 101(3), pages 1925-1939, December.
    2. Jiang Tan & Hui-Zhen Fu & Yuh-Shan Ho, 2014. "A bibliometric analysis of research on proteomics in Science Citation Index Expanded," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 98(2), pages 1473-1490, February.
    3. Juliana A. Ivar do Sul & Alexander S. Tagg & Matthias Labrenz, 2018. "Exploring the common denominator between microplastics and microbiology: a scientometric approach," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 117(3), pages 2145-2157, December.
    4. Saad Ahmed Javed & Sifeng Liu, 2018. "Predicting the research output/growth of selected countries: application of Even GM (1, 1) and NDGM models," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 115(1), pages 395-413, April.
    5. Yue Hu & Jun Sun & Weimin Li & Yunlong Pan, 2014. "A scientometric study of global electric vehicle research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 98(2), pages 1269-1282, February.
    6. T. Gorjiara & C. Baldock, 2014. "Nanoscience and nanotechnology research publications: a comparison between Australia and the rest of the world," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 100(1), pages 121-148, July.
    7. Elena M. Tur & Evangelos Bourelos & Maureen McKelvey, 2022. "The case of sleeping beauties in nanotechnology: a study of potential breakthrough inventions in emerging technologies," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 69(3), pages 683-708, December.
    8. Nicholas V. Olijnyk, 2015. "A quantitative examination of the intellectual profile and evolution of information security from 1965 to 2015," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(2), pages 883-904, November.
    9. Jiancheng Guan & He Wei, 2015. "A bilateral comparison of research performance at an institutional level," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 104(1), pages 147-173, July.
    10. Shao-jie Zhang & Peng-hui Lyu & Yan Yan, 2015. "Global geographical and scientometric analysis of tourism-themed research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(1), pages 385-401, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jpubli:v:6:y:2018:i:4:p:40-:d:172052. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.