Gender Diversity and Psychosocial Work Risks from a Non-Binary Perspective: A Systematic Review

This systematic review examines how gender shapes exposure to and experiences of psychosocial risks in the workplace. Drawing on 89 empirical studies published between 2010 and 2024, the review synthesizes evidence from occupational health psychology, gender studies, and organizational research. Searches were conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, and PsycINFO, and included empirical studies published in English and Spanish. Following PRISMA guidelines, a qualitative thematic synthesis was conducted to integrate findings across diverse sectors, populations, and methodological approaches. The evidence reveals persistent gendered patterns in psychosocial risk exposure and outcomes: women are more frequently exposed to emotionally demanding and relational forms of work and report poorer mental health outcomes; men experience performance-driven strain linked to workload, competition, and reward insecurity more often; and transgender and non-binary workers face additional psychosocial burdens associated with stigma, discrimination, and minority stress. Across the literature, structural and cultural determinants—such as occupational segregation, unequal recognition, and gendered organizational norms—emerge as central mechanisms underlying these disparities. Theoretical frameworks including effort–reward imbalance, demand–control, work–family conflict, organizational climate, and minority stress collectively contribute to explaining how gendered psychosocial risks are produced and sustained. Overall, the review underscores the need to move beyond individualistic and binary models of psychosocial risk toward gender-responsive approaches that account for structural, relational, and identity-based dimensions of work, thereby informing research and organizational strategies aimed at promoting equitable and sustainable well-being at work.