IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v7y2019i5p406-d228962.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A New Parameter Estimator for the Generalized Pareto Distribution under the Peaks over Threshold Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Xu Zhao

    (College of Applied Sciences, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China)

  • Zhongxian Zhang

    (College of Applied Sciences, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China)

  • Weihu Cheng

    (College of Applied Sciences, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China)

  • Pengyue Zhang

    (Department of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA)

Abstract

Techniques used to analyze exceedances over a high threshold are in great demand for research in economics, environmental science, and other fields. The generalized Pareto distribution (GPD) has been widely used to fit observations exceeding the tail threshold in the peaks over threshold (POT) framework. Parameter estimation and threshold selection are two critical issues for threshold-based GPD inference. In this work, we propose a new GPD-based estimation approach by combining the method of moments and likelihood moment techniques based on the least squares concept, in which the shape and scale parameters of the GPD can be simultaneously estimated. To analyze extreme data, the proposed approach estimates the parameters by minimizing the sum of squared deviations between the theoretical GPD function and its expectation. Additionally, we introduce a recently developed stopping rule to choose the suitable threshold above which the GPD asymptotically fits the exceedances. Simulation studies show that the proposed approach performs better or similar to existing approaches, in terms of bias and the mean square error, in estimating the shape parameter. In addition, the performance of three threshold selection procedures is assessed by estimating the value-at-risk (VaR) of the GPD. Finally, we illustrate the utilization of the proposed method by analyzing air pollution data. In this analysis, we also provide a detailed guide regarding threshold selection.

Suggested Citation

  • Xu Zhao & Zhongxian Zhang & Weihu Cheng & Pengyue Zhang, 2019. "A New Parameter Estimator for the Generalized Pareto Distribution under the Peaks over Threshold Framework," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-18, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:7:y:2019:i:5:p:406-:d:228962
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/7/5/406/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/7/5/406/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Castillo, Joan del & Serra, Isabel, 2015. "Likelihood inference for generalized Pareto distribution," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 116-128.
    2. Park, Myung Hyun & Kim, Joseph H.T., 2016. "Estimating extreme tail risk measures with generalized Pareto distribution," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 91-104.
    3. Abdelaati Daouia & Stéphane Girard & Gilles Stupfler, 2018. "Estimation of tail risk based on extreme expectiles," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 80(2), pages 263-292, March.
    4. P. Zea Bermudez & M. Turkman, 2003. "Bayesian approach to parameter estimation of the generalized pareto distribution," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 12(1), pages 259-277, June.
    5. Max Grazier G'Sell & Stefan Wager & Alexandra Chouldechova & Robert Tibshirani, 2016. "Sequential selection procedures and false discovery rate control," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 78(2), pages 423-444, March.
    6. Song, Jongwoo & Song, Seongjoo, 2012. "A quantile estimation for massive data with generalized Pareto distribution," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 143-150, January.
    7. Pavel V. Shevchenko, 2010. "Implementing loss distribution approach for operational risk," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(3), pages 277-307, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Moch Panji Agung Saputra & Diah Chaerani & Sukono & Mazlynda Md. Yusuf, 2023. "Reserve Fund Optimization Model for Digital Banking Transaction Risk with Extreme Value-at-Risk Constraints," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-16, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dylan Troop & Frédéric Godin & Jia Yuan Yu, 2022. "Best-Arm Identification Using Extreme Value Theory Estimates of the CVaR," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-15, April.
    2. Hideki Nagatsuka & N. Balakrishnan, 2021. "Efficient likelihood-based inference for the generalized Pareto distribution," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 73(6), pages 1153-1185, December.
    3. Castillo, Joan del & Serra, Isabel, 2015. "Likelihood inference for generalized Pareto distribution," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 116-128.
    4. Taoufik Bouezmarni & Mohamed Doukali & Abderrahim Taamouti, 2023. "Testing Granger Non-Causality in Expectiles," University of East Anglia School of Economics Working Paper Series 2023-02, School of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK..
    5. Chen, Yu & Ma, Mengyuan & Sun, Hongfang, 2023. "Statistical inference for extreme extremile in heavy-tailed heteroscedastic regression model," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 142-162.
    6. H. Kaibuchi & Y. Kawasaki & G. Stupfler, 2022. "GARCH-UGH: a bias-reduced approach for dynamic extreme Value-at-Risk estimation in financial time series," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(7), pages 1277-1294, July.
    7. Litimein, Ouahiba & Laksaci, Ali & Mechab, Boubaker & Bouzebda, Salim, 2023. "Local linear estimate of the functional expectile regression," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    8. X. Jessie Jeng & Huimin Peng & Wenbin Lu, 2021. "Model Selection With Mixed Variables on the Lasso Path," Sankhya B: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 83(1), pages 170-184, May.
    9. Marek Arendarczyk & Tomasz J. Kozubowski & Anna K. Panorska, 2022. "The Greenwood statistic, stochastic dominance, clustering and heavy tails," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 49(1), pages 331-352, March.
    10. Daouia, Abdelaati & Paindaveine, Davy, 2019. "Multivariate Expectiles, Expectile Depth and Multiple-Output Expectile Regression," TSE Working Papers 19-1022, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), revised Feb 2023.
    11. Daouia, Abdelaati & Stupfler, Gilles & Usseglio-Carleve, Antoine, 2022. "Inference for extremal regression with dependent heavy-tailed data," TSE Working Papers 22-1324, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), revised 29 Aug 2023.
    12. Daouia, Abdelaati & Girard, Stéphane & Stupfler, Gilles, 2018. "Tail expectile process and risk assessment," TSE Working Papers 18-944, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
    13. Federico Palacios-González & Rosa M. García-Fernández, 2020. "A faster algorithm to estimate multiresolution densities," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 35(3), pages 1207-1230, September.
    14. Xiaolin Luo & Pavel V. Shevchenko, 2012. "Bayesian Model Choice of Grouped t-Copula," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 1097-1119, December.
    15. Véronique Maume-Deschamps & Didier Rullière & Khalil Said, 2017. "Multivariate Extensions Of Expectiles Risk Measures," Working Papers hal-01367277, HAL.
    16. Mao, Tiantian & Stupfler, Gilles & Yang, Fan, 2023. "Asymptotic properties of generalized shortfall risk measures for heavy-tailed risks," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 173-192.
    17. Damian Kozbur, 2020. "Analysis of Testing‐Based Forward Model Selection," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 88(5), pages 2147-2173, September.
    18. James Ming Chen, 2018. "On Exactitude in Financial Regulation: Value-at-Risk, Expected Shortfall, and Expectiles," Risks, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-28, June.
    19. Hoga, Yannick, 2021. "The uncertainty in extreme risk forecasts from covariate-augmented volatility models," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 675-686.
    20. Gong, Siliang & Zhang, Kai & Liu, Yufeng, 2018. "Efficient test-based variable selection for high-dimensional linear models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 17-31.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:7:y:2019:i:5:p:406-:d:228962. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.