IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v7y2018i2p71-d150822.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the Land and Vegetation Cover of Abandoned Fire Hazardous and Rewetted Peatlands: Comparing Different Multispectral Satellite Data

Author

Listed:
  • Andrey Sirin

    (Institute of Forest Science, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow Region, 143030 Uspenskoye, Russia)

  • Maria Medvedeva

    (Institute of Forest Science, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow Region, 143030 Uspenskoye, Russia)

  • Alexander Maslov

    (Institute of Forest Science, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow Region, 143030 Uspenskoye, Russia)

  • Anna Vozbrannaya

    (Meschera State National Park, Ministry of Natural Resources of Russian Federation, Vladimir Oblast, 601500 Gus-Khrustalny, Russia)

Abstract

Since the 1990s, many peatlands that were drained for peat extraction and agriculture in Russia have been abandoned with high CO 2 emissions and frequent fires, such as the enormous fires around Moscow in 2010. The fire hazard in these peatlands can be reduced through peatland rewetting and wetland restoration, so monitoring peatland status is essential. However, large expanses, poor accessibility, and fast plant succession pose as challenges for monitoring these areas without satellite images. In this study, a technique involving multispectral satellite data was used to identify six land cover classes that meet the requirements for peatland monitoring using the Meschera National Park as the testing area. This park is the largest area of once-exploited and now rewetted peatlands. However, data from one scanner are often insufficient to successfully implement this technique. In this study, we compared the land cover classifications obtained by using data from Spot-5, Spot-6, Landsat-7, Landsat-8, and Sentinel-2 satellites. The Spot-6 data were insufficient, despite having a higher spatial resolution, due to the lack of a shortwave infrared (SWIR) band. The high classification accuracy attained using data from other sensors enabled their combined use to provide an acceptable accuracy in the final product. The classification results were compared using minimum distance Erdas Imagine and the object-oriented ScanEx Image Processor, and the classification accuracy was similar between satellite images, which facilitates the transition from one method to another without quality loss. The proposed and tested approach can be used to analyze the status of abandoned and rewetted peatlands in other locations for the inventory and prioritization of sites for rewetting and restoration, monitoring status changes, and assessing restoration efficacy. The comparability of the data from different sensors allows for the combination of classified images and creates new possibilities for time series analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrey Sirin & Maria Medvedeva & Alexander Maslov & Anna Vozbrannaya, 2018. "Assessing the Land and Vegetation Cover of Abandoned Fire Hazardous and Rewetted Peatlands: Comparing Different Multispectral Satellite Data," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-22, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:7:y:2018:i:2:p:71-:d:150822
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/7/2/71/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/7/2/71/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andrey Sirin & Maria Medvedeva & Vladimir Korotkov & Victor Itkin & Tatiana Minayeva & Danil Ilyasov & Gennady Suvorov & Hans Joosten, 2021. "Addressing Peatland Rewetting in Russian Federation Climate Reporting," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-17, November.
    2. Lijun Mao & Mingshi Li & Wenjuan Shen, 2020. "Remote Sensing Applications for Monitoring Terrestrial Protected Areas: Progress in the Last Decade," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-27, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:7:y:2018:i:2:p:71-:d:150822. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.