IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i9p1796-d1741250.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Renewal Pathways for Inefficient Industrial Land in Zhejiang Province: A Spatial Production Theory Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Shujie Kong

    (School of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)

  • Hui Wang

    (School of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)

Abstract

As Chinese cities move toward stock-based development, the redevelopment of inefficient industrial land has become essential for urban spatial restructuring and sustainable transformation. Building on Lefebvre’s triadic theory of spatial production, this study establishes a comprehensive analytical framework consisting of spatial practice, representations of space, and representational spaces, aiming to elucidate the mechanisms underlying spatial reconfiguration. Through a multi-case inductive approach, twelve representative cases from Zhejiang Province are systematically analyzed to reveal the fundamental logic driving spatial reconstruction within the context of inefficient land redevelopment. The results reveal the following: (1) In the process of inefficient land redevelopment, spatial practice involves land reuse and functional integration, representations of space reflect institutional planning, and representational spaces shape meaning through cultural identity and user experience. These dimensions interact dynamically to drive the transformation of both the form and meaning of inefficient land. (2) The redevelopment of inefficient land in Zhejiang can be classified into two primary models: increment-driven and qualitative transformation, which are further divided into seven subtypes. The increment-driven model includes enterprise-initiated renewal, integrated upgrading, platform empowerment, and comprehensive remediation; the qualitative transformation model comprises mine remediation, cultural empowerment, and use conversion. (3) Significant differences exist between these models: the increment-driven model emphasizes land expansion and floor area ratio improvement, while the qualitative transformation model enhances land value through mine restoration, cultural embedding, and functional transformation. This study extends the application of spatial production theory within the Chinese context and offers theoretical support and policy insights for the planning and governance of inefficient industrial land redevelopment.

Suggested Citation

  • Shujie Kong & Hui Wang, 2025. "Renewal Pathways for Inefficient Industrial Land in Zhejiang Province: A Spatial Production Theory Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-36, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:9:p:1796-:d:1741250
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/9/1796/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/9/1796/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hui Tao & Yingzheng Wen & Min Liu & Yuruo Wu, 2025. "Industrial Heritage Protection from the Perspective of Spatial Narrative," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-17, May.
    2. Ahmad, Naveed & Zhu, Yuming & Ullah, Zia & Iqbal, Muzaffar & Hussain, Kramat & Ahmed, Rahil Irfan, 2021. "Sustainable solutions to facilitate brownfield redevelopment projects in emerging countries – Pakistani scenario," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    3. Chen, Yang & Zhang, Xiaoling & Chau, K.W. & Yang, Linchuan, 2022. "How the institutional change in urban redevelopment affects the duration of land redevelopment approval in China?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    4. Yani Lai & Ke Chen & Jinming Zhang & Feihu Liu, 2020. "Transformation of Industrial Land in Urban Renewal in Shenzhen, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-22, October.
    5. Tim Dixon & Yasmin Pocock & Mike Waters, 2006. "An analysis of the UK development industry's role in brownfield regeneration," Journal of Property Investment & Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 24(6), pages 521-541, November.
    6. Dinghuan Yuan & Yung Yau & Haijun Bao & Yongshen Liu & Ting Liu, 2019. "Anatomizing the Institutional Arrangements of Urban Village Redevelopment: Case Studies in Guangzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-16, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ravaz, Belinda & Bombenger, Pierre-Henri & Capezzali, Massimiliano & Meyer, Teva, 2024. "Reviewing 20 years of redevelopment trajectories of industrial sites literature and highlighting new research perspectives," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    2. Jing Cheng, 2024. "Analysis of the Government’s Decision on Leasing Different Lands under Public Ownership of Land," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-23, June.
    3. Lin Jiang & Yani Lai & Ke Chen & Xiao Tang, 2022. "What Drives Urban Village Redevelopment in China? A Survey of Literature Based on Web of Science Core Collection Database," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-16, April.
    4. Dinghuan Yuan & Jiaxin Li & Qiuxiang Li & Yang Fu, 2024. "Tripartite Evolutionary Game and Policy Simulation: Strategic Governance in the Redevelopment of the Urban Village in Guangzhou," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-21, November.
    5. Cao, Kexin & Deng, Yu & Wang, Wenxue & Liu, Shenghe, 2023. "The spatial heterogeneity and dynamics of land redevelopment: Evidence from 287 Chinese cities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    6. Worku Nega & Mulugeta Tenaw & Yeneneh Hunie & Sayeh Kassaw Agegnehu & Reinfried Mansberger, 2021. "Evaluating Institutional Dichotomy between Urban and Rural Land Administration in Amhara Region, Ethiopia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-19, August.
    7. Arturas Kaklauskas & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Natalija Lepkova & Saulius Raslanas & Kestutis Dauksys & Ingrida Vetloviene & Ieva Ubarte, 2021. "Sustainable Construction Investment, Real Estate Development, and COVID-19: A Review of Literature in the Field," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-42, July.
    8. Jia-He Zhou & Chao-Yue Yu & Zheng-Feng Zhang & Lei He & Hong-Li Lin, 2025. "Evaluating and prioritizing interdependent strategies for construction land reduction in China with interdependent sustainability criteria: an integrated multi-criteria decision-making approach," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, December.
    9. Alina Maciejewska & Łukasz Kuzak & Marianna Ulanicka-Raczyńska & Kamil Moreau, 2022. "Land Management Using Land Reserves to Alleviate Emergencies on the Example of Warsaw," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-19, September.
    10. Jihong Li & Kaiming Li & Rongxu Qiu, 2022. "The Suburbanization and Revitalization of Industrial Land in Shanghai, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-18, June.
    11. Bonoua Faye & Guoming Du & Ru Zhang, 2022. "Efficiency Analysis of Land Use and the Degree of Coupling Link between Population Growth and Global Built-Up Area in the Subregion of West Africa," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-21, June.
    12. Peichao Dai & Ruxu Sheng & Zhongzhen Miao & Zanxu Chen & Yuan Zhou, 2021. "Analysis of Spatial–Temporal Characteristics of Industrial Land Supply Scale in Relation to Industrial Structure in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-18, November.
    13. Nina Danilina & Anna Korobeinikova & Irina Teplova, 2024. "Decision-Making Approach for Land Use in Urban Industrial Area Redevelopment Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-33, November.
    14. Yang Zhang & Xiaomeng Luo & Shuqing Wang & Chang Liu, 2023. "Green Redevelopment of Industrial Brownfields: Driving Mechanism and Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-15, November.
    15. Zhengbin Liang, 2025. "Strategic land allocation in China’s urban renewal: the role of non-market mechanisms," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 5(5), pages 1-16, May.
    16. Oriyomi Modupe Okeyinka & Rana Khan & Chaminda Pathirage & Charf El Dine Mahammedi & Antony West, 2023. "A Critical Review of Developers’ Decision Criteria for Brownfield Regeneration: Development of the BRIC Index," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-25, April.
    17. Lizheng Zhang & Yumin Ye & Jiejing Wang, 2022. "Influential Factors and Geographical Differences in the Redevelopment Willingness of Urban Villagers: A Case Study of Guangzhou, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-18, February.
    18. Zhongde Wang & Yuhan Liu & Ling Yang & Fanwei Meng, 2025. "Evaluation of the Narrative Value and Experiential Quality of Urban Trails: A Case Study of the Southwest Regional Trail in Chongqing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-21, June.
    19. Xiaodong Zhang & Kaifeng Duan & Lun Yang & Xiaokun Wei, 2024. "Land Regulation and Local Service Provision: Can Economic Growth and Environmental Protection Be Achieved Simultaneously?," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-23, September.
    20. Wanrong Li & Queena Qian & Erwin Mlecnik & Shutong He & Kun Song, 2025. "Forging Enhanced Collaboration: Investigating Transaction Costs in Pre-Design Phase of Market-Oriented Community Renovation in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-26, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:9:p:1796-:d:1741250. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.