Author
Listed:
- Abhilash Dutta Roy
(Ecoresolve, San Francisco, CA 94105, USA
Mediterranean Forestry and Natural Resources Management, School of Agriculture, University of Lisbon, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349-017 Lisboa, Portugal)
- Abraham Ranglong
(Department of Forestry and Biodiversity, Tripura University, Suryamaninagar, Tripura 799202, India)
- Sandeep Timilsina
(Mediterranean Forestry and Natural Resources Management, School of Agriculture, University of Lisbon, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349-017 Lisboa, Portugal)
- Sumit Kumar Das
(Department of Forestry and Biodiversity, Tripura University, Suryamaninagar, Tripura 799202, India)
- Michael S. Watt
(Scion, Christchurch 8011, New Zealand)
- Sergio de-Miguel
(Department of Agricultural and Forest Sciences and Engineering, University of Lleida, 25198 Lleida, Spain)
- Sourabh Deb
(Department of Forestry and Biodiversity, Tripura University, Suryamaninagar, Tripura 799202, India)
- Uttam Kumar Sahoo
(Department of Forestry, Mizoram University, Aizawl 796004, India)
- Midhun Mohan
(Ecoresolve, San Francisco, CA 94105, USA)
Abstract
The distribution of forest aboveground biomass density (AGBD) is a key indicator of carbon stock and ecosystem health in the Eastern Himalayas, which represents a global biodiversity hotspot that sustains diverse forest types across an elevation gradient from lowland rainforests to alpine meadows and contributes to the livelihoods of more than 200 distinct indigenous communities. This study aimed to identify the key factors influencing forest AGBD across this region by analyzing the underlying biophysical and anthropogenic drivers through machine learning (random forest). We processed AGBD data from the Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) spaceborne LiDAR and applied filtering to retain 30,257 high-quality footprints across ten ecoregions. We then analyzed the relationship between AGBD and 17 climatic, topographic, soil, and anthropogenic variables using random forest regression models. The results revealed significant spatial variability in AGBD (149.6 ± 79.5 Mg ha −1 ) across the region. State-wise, Sikkim recorded the highest mean AGBD (218 Mg ha −1 ) and Manipur the lowest (102.8 Mg ha −1 ). Within individual ecoregions, the Himalayan subtropical pine forests exhibited the highest mean AGBD (245.5 Mg ha −1 ). Topographic factors, particularly elevation and latitude, were strong determinants of biomass distribution, with AGBD increasing up to elevations of 2000 m before declining. Protected areas (PAs) consistently showed higher AGBD than unprotected forests for all ecoregions, while proximity to urban and agricultural areas resulted in lower AGBD, pointing towards negative anthropogenic impacts. Our full model explained 41% of AGBD variance across the Eastern Himalayas, with better performance in individual ecoregions like the Northeast India-Myanmar pine forests (R 2 = 0.59). While limited by the absence of regionally explicit stand-level forest structure data (age, stand density, species composition), our results provide valuable evidence for conservation policy development, including expansion of PAs, compensating avoided deforestation and modifications in shifting cultivation. Future research should integrate field measurements with remote sensing and use high-resolution LiDAR with locally derived allometric models to enhance biomass estimation and GEDI data validation.
Suggested Citation
Abhilash Dutta Roy & Abraham Ranglong & Sandeep Timilsina & Sumit Kumar Das & Michael S. Watt & Sergio de-Miguel & Sourabh Deb & Uttam Kumar Sahoo & Midhun Mohan, 2025.
"Spaceborne LiDAR Reveals Anthropogenic and Biophysical Drivers Shaping the Spatial Distribution of Forest Aboveground Biomass in Eastern Himalayas,"
Land, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-25, July.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:8:p:1540-:d:1711111
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:8:p:1540-:d:1711111. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.